Karnataka CM Yeddyurappa rules out resigning ... Does he rule out CRYING too?

In his most recent show of manliness, Karnataka Chief-Minister Mr. Yeddyurappa has ruled out resigning. He says: “Why should I (resign)? There is no offence from my side. I have not committed any mistake,”. This is what he supposedly told reporters in Bangalore before leaving for New Delhi. Now I have a question for Mr. Yeddy: why did you cry if you never did anything wrong? Why are you running to "High-Command" in Delhi? What can you prove by going to Delhi?

So this is what our country is: An elected self-proclaimed "upright CM" runs like a pussy to New Delhi to prove his innocence. And this is in a party, which proclaims itself to be a party with a difference. So folks, do you understand what the difference is? Is the difference that in Congress it is high-command = Sonia, and in BJP it is high-command = Sushma? No matter that it is old-wise-man LKAdvani and young-wise-man NitinGadkari holding a one-on-one talk in Delhi to decide Yeddy's fate.

How can there be a healthy and vibrant democracy in the presence of a high-command culture? Is Congress democratic? NO. Is JD(S) democratic? NO. Each party is a Congress with different Nehru-Gandhi equivalents at the helm. The high-command is taken to be wise. So Sonia-Rahul in Congress, Devegowda-Kumaraswamy in JD(S) are the decision makers. Why, because it is they who have most of the money, and all parties need money.

So today BSY will claim that he has not done any wrong, and yet he may resign tomorrow at the behest of his high-command. It does not depend upon whether BSY is right or not. That is an insignificant point. What is important is who wields more power, AnanthKumar or BSY, Sushma or BSY. And even if there is truce, it is only a temporary lull before another impending storm. Moreover, remember that the moment Yeddy's fate hangs in balance, the fate of his loyal ministers also hangs in balance! No points for guessing who BSY considers as his loyal ministers.

Governments may go or not go, Chief-ministers may go or not go; but the EGOs of these stupid politicians will never go.

Besides Hooliganism and Goonda-Raj, Congress also supports Scam-Raj, and Scam-Raja!

How many of us understand the meaning of One Lakh Seventy Thousand Crore Rupees? Well, that is the alleged size of the scam in 2-G disbursement. Raja may have been asked to resign, but there are a few important questions:

1. Was Raja so skilled that he could pull it off without even a whiff of a hint to any other member of the government (ministers-bureaucrats)? If yes, then they are all damn fools who must at once be thrown out! If no, then all those who had the knowledge must also be charged appropriately.

2. What is the stand of the Kalaigner M Karunanidhi? Does he prefer to look with begoggled-eyes in the dark at the follies of his coterie?

3. What is the stand of UPA Chairperson Sonia? Is she aloof and distant? Why is she not throwing DMK out of the UPA, if DMK is not throwing out Scam-Raja? Of course, the oft-repeated answer is a platitude, that there are only charges, no indictment as yet; but the real answer is that all of these people must have received their percentages.

4. What is the stand of SP on this? After chastising their own ex-chief for his mere exercise of his freedom of speech, are the brainless lot of SP exercising their freedom of silence?

There are more questions than there are even hints of answers.

Hypocrisy of Jawahar and Congress Exposed once again, for the N'th time!

In a recent news paper item it was reported that Jawahar had pleaded to president Kennedy of America to help India during the 1962 Indo-China conflict. This is no surprise to those who know and respect facts and who have even a miniscule understanding of strategy and defense, or just a little bit of common sense.

Again, Congress leaders lack both, for they are blinded by their back-side-licking culture, which makes them grovelingly servile to the members of Jawahar-Mohandas family, however incompetent they may be.

So, these stupid Congress leaders are terming this act of Jawahar as his pragmatism. To the meanest intelligence, however, it is obvious that Jawahar's vision, policies were all utter failures. The wise men from congress are accusing America of betraying India, while it was stupidity and fool-hardiness of Jawahar that betrayed India.

O, Hindus (Hindu-WOL), please open your political eyes and act.

Elst responds to Secular-Stooge

Just when I was admiring the courage of M V Kamath in my previous post, a reader sent me Koenraad Elst's reply (A must read) to the JNU-type-Self-proclaimed historian Guha. Guha is currently epitomizing the Hindu-haters dissected by Mr Kamath.

Guha's claim to fame is his backside licking skills which he practices on those he considers "Bold and the Beautiful". Guha's B&B list includes the likes of members of Nehru-Gandhi family, cricketers in India, and the likes. He appears on talk shows as an intellectual (phew) and farts by sublimating the garbage that fills his otherwise empty shoulder-top (his head). Those who might want to have a glimpse of his, please check wikipedia entry on him. He is also described by his leftist admirers as Arun Shourie of the left. The left specializes in the art of mutual backside licking. One could even term it as the Left-69 position!

The summary of the exchange is as follows:

Guha in an article titled "Foreign Certificates" in The Hindu, pooh-poohed Mr Elst's credentials as a historian to which Mr. Elst sent a fitting reply, which was never published by the news paper. So Mr. Elst has replied in a post.

What an irony, Hindu-haters having first names like "Ramchandra", and Hindu-hating publications having names like "The Hindu"? They all are, Mohandasian in their advice to Hindus. For example, while they always recommend appeasement of the anti-Hindus, they advise strictures against ever-erring-Hindus! They will blame RSS, obviously wrongly, for Mohandas assassination but, again wrongly, absolve Congress and its hooligans of violence against Sikhs in 1984!

The self-appointed Guha surely belongs to the list of those who must be discredited for spreading lies.

MVKamath chastises the pseudo-secularists and then gives in to their "world-view"

In a recent article which has been syndicated here, columnist M V Kamath made very important observations about the sickness of pseudo-secularists. For example:

1. Hiding the bloody and barbaric persecution of Hindus by Islamic and Christian invaders in the past.

2. Running down Hinduism and Hindu culture.

These are important points and deserve compliments as well as attention. But then he turns around and nullifies his own understanding by the following: "We will over come ...but a Good people with an open heart, ready to forget a painful past, ready to work with all people irrespective of their religion, ..."(italics mine). It is necessary to appreciate that it is this philosophy of "Absolute Non-discrimination" which is implied in the quoted text that began the down slide of our great civilization.

We must understand that the failure was not merely political, it was a kind of spiritual-stupidity as well. It is like Mohandas making "Non-violence of the Mohandas kind" the highest principle to owe allegiance to. Hindus are non-violent only in the sense that Lord Krishna was non-violent, where he adjured Arjuna to fight the unrighteousness with military might, and not the meek surrender that Mohandas was advocating for the Jews and the Allied forces during World War II against Hitler's atrocities. For example here:

"I would like you to lay down the arms you have as being useless for saving you or humanity. You will invite Herr Hitler and Signor Mussolini to take what they want of the countries you call your possessions...If these gentlemen choose to occupy your homes, you will vacate them. If they do not give you free passage out, you will allow yourselves, man, woman, and child, to be slaughtered, but you will refuse to owe allegiance to them."

and

"Hitler," Gandhi said, "killed five million Jews. It is the greatest crime of our time. But the Jews should have offered themselves to the butcher’s knife. They should have thrown themselves into the sea from cliffs... It would have aroused the world and the people of Germany... As it is they succumbed anyway in their millions."

"If I were a Jew and were born in Germany and earned my livelihood there, I would claim Germany as my home even as the tallest Gentile German might, and challenge him to shoot me or cast me in the dungeon; I would refuse to be expelled or to submit to discriminating treatment. And for doing this I should not wait for the fellow Jews to join me in civil resistance, but would have confidence that in the end the rest were bound to follow my example. If one Jew or all the Jews were to accept the prescription here offered, he or they cannot be worse off than now. And suffering voluntarily undergone will bring them an inner strength and joy...the calculated violence of Hitler may even result in a general massacre of the Jews by way of his first answer to the declaration of such hostilities. But if the Jewish mind could be prepared for voluntary suffering, even the massacre I have imagined could be turned into a day of thanksgiving and joy that Jehovah had wrought deliverance of the race even at the hands of the tyrant. For to the God-fearing, death has no terror."

No wonder Mohandas'a grandson, another Mohandasian bigot, commented, what he did. David Lewis Schaefer has rightly termed Mohandas a one-sided-pacifist.

It is very important to completely discredit the hideous philosophy of people like Mohandas. Authors, even when they make good points like Mr. Kamath did, must assiduously guard against inadvertently approving subscription to Absolute Non-discrimination of the confused modern liberal media philosophers.

But for this, MVK's observations are a good beginning towards correcting our folly. If his recommendations imply complete over-haul of history-education specially in schools, which is currently infested with Jawaharian doctored history created by JNU academicians of the Romila Thapar kind, we must all be for it.