Wafa Sultan: If only a few of our main stream leaders had the clarity of this lady

Wafa Sultan is a doctor from Syria who emigrated to the USA. She is a vociferous critic of Islam, its founder Muhammad, and the Islamic Law, i.e. Sharia.

She points out (see videos here) unequivocally that Islam wants to take over the whole world, subjugate all non-Muslims with a view to converting or killing them.

Most importantly she points out that it is not some fringe interpretation of Islam, not Radical Islam, not Islamofascism and all such non-sense which she insists are terms that are product of fertile imagination and suicidal tendencies born out of Political Correctness; rather it is Islam itself which IS the danger and which is the problem.

She calls Muhammad a false prophet who was a self-gratifying-pedophile, and Allah a God-who-hates, which also the title of one her books.

She has debated (in Arabic) with Mullahs and clerics and Arab diplomats (even on Al Jazeera).

We recommend our readers to watch some of her speeches and see for themselves what is meant by "Boldly speaking the Truth".

Election-2012: Results and Lessons

Congress has faced a humiliating defeat in the elections in the UP. The blame needs to be shared by Rahul Gandhi, however that is not the end of story. The real cause of this humiliating defeat is not, as some would have us believe, to be taken as rejection of Brand Rahul. India is still a psychophantic nation. Indira Gandhi was rejected in 1977 and came back with thumping majority in 1980. After what she had inflicted on the people of this country, she should have been rejected for ever; but Congress being what it is stuck to Indira Gandhi, and Indians being what they are voted Indira Gandhi back to power. So Brand Rahul is down but not out.

Stretching the analogy with Indira debacle of 1977 further, if Indira lost due to emergency, the question arises why Rahul lost UP. There are a few questions which need to be asked. First is, what would have happened if Rahul was not there? Would Congress get more seats than it got? The answer is an unequivocal NO. Secondly, what is the analogue of emergency here? We give our perspective in the following.

Firstly, Congress, anyway, would have lost badly because of the sins of UPA II. For a long time, in India, political parties do not win elections. It is just that some parties lose more than some others. Some due to perceptible failures, and the many owing to their own internal bickering. In our opinion, it is a mistake to think that Mulayam's SP has won the elections; rather it is that BJP, BSP and Congress have lost these elections for various reasons. And we explain our reasons for thinking so.

1. With the magnitude of Corruption that UPA-II has been tainted with at the center, no one wanted to vote for the Congress if there was any other choice. For example, in Manipur where the people are struggling to join the main stream, and the Church is wanting to prop up Sonia, there was hardly any choice for people other than Congress, and so Congress won. Otherwise, in Uttarakhand, despite serious problems with the BJP, Congress merely managed one seat more than BJP. In Punjab, despite corruption charges against SAD, Congress lost. So it is a mistake to attribute the loss of Congress in UP to Rahul, rather a major factor for the loss has been UPA-II itself. Thus Congress lost in UP, Punjab, Goa etc.

2. Mayawati's regime was mired in allegations and while others were working hard, Mayawati was arrogantly confident. With the statues of the Elephant and Mayawati galore all over UP, there was no reason Mayawati would have won. One must remember, except at one's own great peril, that Indians HATE even a hint of arrogance more than anything else!

3. BJP in UP can not win in another thousand years if they do not respect Shri Kalyan Singh and if they do not reject Rajnath Singh. After sacrificing Kalyan Singh, Uma Bharati and Govindacharya at the altar of fragile egos of Vajpeyee and the likes; how can BJP expect even a semblance of trust and respect from the people in UP? Can you afford to kick your most loyal soldiers and yet hope to get respect? And the shamelessness was thoroughly exposed when they invited Uma Bharati to campaign in UP. So you kick a person and then when you are on death bed you request the kicked-person to bring in an ambulance? We are sure, Rajnath's men conspired as well.

4. So with each of these three "losing" what was left? Mulayam's SP! And so they won!

Secondly, the "emergency-like" mistake by Rahul Gandhi was to adopt anti-Hindu, pro-DogVijay stance.

1. A person who thinks (recall wikileaks) that Hindu-Terror is more dangerous than Islamic Terror must be seriously insane! Islam has overseen the killing of more than a hundred million people over past fourteen centuries. It killed more than eighty million Hindus during past twelve hundred years, and they killed these Hindus merely because they were Hindus. How can something be more dangerous than Islamic Terror so easily?

2. A person who takes DogVijay Stink as his advisor is bound to fall into a ditch. DogVijay was bent upon making Rahul more Maulana than Maulana Yadav (Mulayam Yadav), and Rahul complied and that was his biggest foolishness. While Maulana Yadav was recasting himself as a Hanuman devotee, the DogVijya was busy casting Rahul Gandhi as a Sulaiman devotee!

Lessons for Rahul:

Indira apologized to the people of the nation for emergency and vowed NEVER to impose emergency. Rahul needs to do something similar. He has to begin by telling the nation who he really is, what his real name is, what his real nationality is, etc. Then Rahul Gandhi needs to apologize to the Hindus for his grave error, and vow never to move even a millimeter against the Hindus. He needs to demostrate a pro-Hindu stand by kicking out DogVijay Singh and questioning the very tenets of Islam. This will surely clear his sins to some extent.

Come 2014, and Congress will lose, but if Rahul adopts these changes, and becomes Pro-Hindu and Islam-critic, Congress will still lose, but will retain respectability. Election 2012 is not the failure of Brand Rahul, rather it is the failure of UPA-II and anti-Hindu Brand DogVijay Stink.

Lessons for Politicians:

Politicians have to question their fundamental premises and cease to use dividing the majority and unite the minority strategy. Otherwise, they will do what their predecessors have largely been doing, that is selling the Nation to make Personal Profits. Once the country rises in revolt against such politicians, they will see really pathetic nightmares.

Politicians must focus on strengthening India's foundations which is Sanatana Dharma, and focus on providing good governance (therefore also the least governance and more liberty) free from Corruption.

Lessons for Congress:

Congress must cease to function as the representatives of the British in India, and become representatives of the majority in India. Politics is about providing leadership and governance. As the oldest party, it must shoulder its burden bravely and gracefully. What Rahul has to learn, has to be learnt by Congress in general. Get rid of their bogus legacy and root for the basics. India is nothing if not for Sanatana Dharma. Trying to make India a Secular Socialist Republic is an evil dream and Congress must shun it.

Lessons for BJP:

BJP can not take Hindus for granted. It can not demonize those who have sacrificed, in whatever manner, especially under the dictats of the high-command, for the Hindu-cause, and then hope to gain sympathy of the Hindus. BJP has to work as hard as any other party to regain their legitimacy in the eyes of the Hindus. If they fail to do so, in Election 2014, they will be unpleasantly surprised by coming a distant Third.

They need to support Narendra Modi lock, stock and barrel; and restrain him only of he drifts in the direction of Secularism (Muslim Appeasement) and Socialism (Greater Governmental Control). Arun Jaitley, Sushama Swaraj, and Advani must realize that their prime ministerial dream for 2014 will destroy the BJP as well as themselves.

Lessons for BSP:

BSP has come a long way from the Kanshiram days of "Tilak, Taraju aur Talwar, inako maaro joote chaar" (Brahmins, Vaishyas and Kshatriyas have to be hit with Shoes) to a strategic alliance with the Brahmins. Other than Dalit rennaissance, BSP has no agenda, and such an agenda is not enough. Compounded with that, Mayawati arrogance can only take the BSP further down. Mayawati has about fifteen more years of active political years still left in her. If she wants to fulfil her PM-dream, she has to realign herself with ideas which have appeal for the majority, rather than only for her vote bank.

Lessons for SP:

Rejection of the others should not be misconstrued for one's own victory. If SP gloats over this victory and indulges in Muslim-Yadav combine politics combined with arrogance then they might as well draw a lesson from looking at Mayawati this time. However, if SP accepts this as an opportunity to serve the people (not just Yadavs and least of all only Muslims), then they might do better. Further, Mulayam must realize that merely holding a mace in Election rallies is not enough. Especially the promise of 18 percent reservation for Muslims was a back-stabbing on all true devotees of Hanuman. If Mulayam retreads the Maulana ways, he must be finished by the Hindus. Likewise, If Mulayam is a true devotee of Hanuman, he has to quickly understand the danger lurking in the form of Sulaiman (Islam), and mend his ways. Rather he must embark on saving the Muslims from Islam.

Lessons for Hindus:

Rahul's great grand father Jawahar was one of the biggest poison against Hindus, and his sur-name contains the name of another of the biggest poison against the Hindus. So Rahul Gandhi has to bear the cross and work diligently to undo the humongous harm done by his ancestry. Hindus, on the other hand, should be extremely cautious and NOT forgive Rahul as easlily as they did his grand-mother Indira. Unless Rahul takes up Hindu-revival with ten times more enthusiasm than he took to the lanes of UP, and throws all Secular anti-Hindu Morons from his company and anti-Hindu ideas from his conceptual lexicon, and does each of these demonstrably; he has to be Rejected.

If just a hint of Hindu uprising and awareness made Maulana Mulayam a Hanuman devotee Mulayam then imagine what a genuine Hindu uprising and awareness will do. Election 2012 saw merely a dash of pro-Hindu postures by the likes of Mulayam along with electoral debacle for Maulavi appeasing tactics of Rahul. Hindus must force the politican parties to weild highly pro-Hindu candidates and promote pro-Hindu policies. Hindus must encourage and promote people to become good politicians to work in the service of Sanatana Bharat.

Some years ago elections were fought on the plan of true-secularism and pseudo-secularism. For past few elections the plank has been good-governance and development. Let 2014 be fought on the plan of truly pro-Hindu versus pseudo-pro-Hindu, and Hindus must make the most pro-Hindu candidates, and a party with declared pro-Hindu policies win the elections. At the very least, all anti-Hindu forces must be made to bite the dust.

Lawyers versus Media Persons: What we need to Learn

There was high drama, or should we say bloody drama, at the Civil Court in Bangalore where lawyers violently attacked media persons. This was followed by the usual: Media being outraged by this, every Tom-Dick-and-Harry expressing anguish over that, Politicians hurling accusations against one another, and Ministers promising quick and decisive action against the perpetrators. This is all routine story, with the end already known; Nothing will come out of this hullabaloo.

However, we would like to point out something crucial here. Lawyers are a part of the Judicial system, in the sense, they are supposed to uphold The Truth in the courts. Similarly, Media are referred to as the Fourth Estate, and are supposed to report The Truth. So here is an interesting incident, those who are supposed to plead for The Truth have clashed with those who are supposed to showcase The Truth.

Given our hypocritical society, this can only mean that neither are lawyers upholding The Truth, nor are the media persons telling The Truth. Our lawyers are exemplified by the likes of Ram Jethmalani while the media-persons are exemplified by the likes of Burkha Dutt.

Since the inception we have been saying that our nation is in a vice-like grip of inveterate dumb-fuckery. The more we degrade, the faster we are degrading; and on top of that we take pride in all this. Take a look at how our moronic parliamentarians yell about the supremacy of the parliament and the infallibility of the constitution. All of us; the supposed-truth-tellers, viz., the media; the supposed truth-upholders, viz., the lawyers, the judges, and the police; the supposed leaders, viz., our politicians; and their followers, viz., the arrogantly ignorant us; have devolved into rank dumb-fucks. The more such blatant incidents occur, the stronger we close our eyes lest we learn The Truth. The more we reap the fruits of hypocrisy the stronger we endeavor in our denial of The Truth.

We urgently need to learn that such hypocrisy will bring us our doom. We need to liberate our Society from the vice of Mohandasian Hypocrisy and establish it on the Truth enunciated by the sages. We need to liberate our system (Constitution, Law, etc.) from the clutches of Jawaharian ignorance and establish it on the Wisdom enunciated by Sanatana Dharma. We need to liberate ourselves from the despondency born out of sloth and invigorate ourselves into action by the inspiration provided by Sanatana Dharma.

Long ago, it would have sufficed if a large fraction of us silently remained honest and good, but we let the degeneration set in. Then it became necessary for us to speak the truth but we remained silent. We were not even voting. Now, it won't suffice to merely vote, for rarely are there any good choices. Now, Good and Honest People need to contest elections. And very soon, that too won't be enough. The Good will have to violently fight both the Bad and the Ugly! We urge Hindus to be prepared for this eventuality.

If you want to Save and Protect Muslims, Please Save and Protect them, ... from Islam

One wonders at the endemic dumb-fuckery of the self proclaimed representatives of Hindus. The Main Stream Media (MSM) which is under tight and total control of the Secular and Socialist (read anti-Hindu) lobby is crying hoarse accusing Bal Thackeray, Narendra Modi and Subramanian Swamy of Extreme Right-Wing Views. While these leaders, who at best are soft-leftists, surely located left of the center, are hell bent upon winning Muslim hearts!

Read this from Bal Thackeray:

In an apparent departure from his Hindutva stand, Thackeray said the Shiv Sena was never against Muslims and his party had protected Muslim colonies during riots.

Juxtapose the above with this:

Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi will lose Shiv Sena's support if he pampered Muslims, the party's chief Bal Thackeray Thursday said.

"If he (Modi) errs, we shall not support him. I will not allow my country and Hindutva to be sullied by this," Thackeray said, referring to Modi's demand for relaxation of visa procedure for Pakistanis wanting to pray at the Ajmer dargah in Rajasthan.

So Modi wants easy visa procedure for Pakistanis! He has never demanded reconstruction of Hindu Temples demolished in Pakistan. In contrast, Pakistan and other Islamic countries shamelessly keep making the stupid demand for restoring the structure, willfully termed as Babari Masjid, which was rightly obliterated for restoration of Ram-Temple.

Subramanian Swamy says that those Muslims who accept that their ancestors were Hindus are acceptable.

Let us proceed step by step:

1. Who is a Muslim?

One who believes in the Koran as the word of Allah (their one and only God) and Muhammad as his last and final prophet. One who accepts the Koran, the Hadith (Reminiscences by early Muslims regarding Muhammad), the Sira (Life of Muhammad) as his scriptures and Muhammad as the eternal role model for Muslims (and therefore himself).

2. What is Islam?

Islam is about submission to Allah as enunciated in the scriptures mentioned above. Non-Muslims must clearly understand that Islam separates the world into two regions: Dar al Islam (where Islam reigns supreme) and Dar al Harb (where Islam is yet to reign supreme). The goal of Islam (and is supposed to be the goal for all Muslims as well) is to bring the whole world under the rule of Islam (that is Sharia Law).

According to Sharia Law: Non-Muslims are inferior (to be treated as cattle) to Muslims. Any opinion even remotely bordering on negating Allah, Koran, or Muhammad is punishable by Death. Muslims are exhorted to use all means including dissimulation (al Taqqiyya) meaning deception, bloody violence, terror, to achieve the goal of bringing the world under rule of Islam.

Muhammad, the eternal role model for all Muslims and for all time to come, himself mercilessly killed people, had forced sex with women whose father, brother and husband were killed by his army, consummated his marriage (had sex with) his wife Aisha when she was nine and he above fifty!

And this is only a trailer of the doctrine of Islam and the eternal role model for all Muslims. For the more gory details, please surf the Internet which is replete with horrifying information if only you care to look.

So what should we make of these supposed pro-Hindu politicians wanting to "save", "help" and "accommodate" Muslims? Firstly we must get our bearings absolutely clear on this: There is no Moderate Islam.

There may be many who call themselves Muslims, who do not know what they are supposed to be doing and therefore are "peaceful". While there may be equally many who are faking themselves to be "peaceful" only as tactical deception in a long drawn war. And we can not tell which is which! A Muslim, if he is good (and is not faking, say), then it is NOT because of Islam, rather it is IN SPITE of Islam! This is why it is said that usually the Best Muslims are the Least Muslims.

Secondly, we must understand that since there is no moderate Islam, if we save Muslims in the conventional sense, that is protecting their freedom to practice their religion, we are planning our own death!

So those who want to "save", "help", or "accommodate" Muslims, must Help Muslims by Saving them from Islam, and then Accommodate them. Anything else is merely another Path to Our Suicide. Thus all politicians who suggest such other solutions must be considered either Soft-Hearted Damn Fools or Outright Evil Traitors.

As far as our opinion on the matter is concerned, we must be crystal clear about the following:

We are interested in Saving Ourselves as Hindus. The only help we can do to Muslims is by inviting them to see the Truth of Islam and leave Islam! But it is for them to Leave Islam. We, as Hindus must be United and Strong enough to Save ourselves from both Islam and Muslims.


For patriotic and discerning politicians we recommend the following:

Hindu Politicians from all political parties must revolt within their own parties and expose Seculars amongst their ranks.

For example: BSP members could form their Ratnakar Sena and Valmiki Sena. Members from the parties of Lalu and Mulayam Singh Yadav could form Krishna Sena, and so on.

Similarly various "Caste Groups" (Currently we do not have a functional Varna system. Caste must be understood in a loose sense) must form their own armies (Senas), viz., Brahmins: Parashuram Sena; Police, Army, and Warrior class personnel: Dharmaraja Sena, Ram Sena, etc.; Business Houses, and business class people: Kubera Sena, and so on. Women folk can have, if they so desire, their own exclusive spectrum of armies from Savitri Sena to Amrapali Sena. Women-folk, even when they are sex-workers by their own choice, must be given their due respect! Sanatana Dharma is meant for all, no matter what one's status is; and while there are functional hierarchies, they do not imply any indignities.

We must resolve to settle all our disputes under the umbrella of Sanatana Dharma (aka Hinduism). For example, Lovers could celebrate Vatsyayan Divas and Kama Sutra Divas under Hindu Umbrella, rather than seeking Valentine's Day type side routes. Similarly, non vegetarians must insist on Non-Halal meat. Hindus must demand that in all Railway Stations, Bus Stations, etc., and Trains, Flights, etc., there must be provision to serve Pure Vegetarian (Jain, ISKCON type) food, as well as Non-Halal non-veg food.

Muslims must be exhorted to understand the poisonous and evil nature of Islam and must be encouraged to quit Islam. Most Muslims who are ignorant of the teachings of Islam will leave Islam spontaneously and willingly. Those who are unwilling to leave Islam must leave the nation of non-Muslims. For non-Muslims must not render their own survival hostage to Muslims realizing the Truth of Islam. Non-Muslims must realize the Truth of Islam and strive to protect themselves on their own.

Besides the traitorous and terrorist politicians, there are villains in the media. There are those for whom a mere vermilion mark on the forehead qualifies for Hindu-Extremism while zillion Muslims shouting "death to non-Muslims" are only innocent victims! Such Secular media persons are equally big traitors and terrorists and their media careers too must be comprehensively destroyed. Those in the media who have love for the Truth must at once call the bluff of these liars.

Thus in Conclusion:

Hindus must unite. Hindus must settle their differences among themselves within Hindu Umbrella. Muslims, Seculars, and Socialists, etc., must be exhorted to see the Truth of Islam, failing which they need to leave. Hindus need to protect themselves on their own.

Incompetent and Corrupt Legislature, Executive and Judiciary

The Supreme Court Judgment on the Ramlila incident has finally completed the circle (news here). Legislature, Executive and the Judiciary are all Evil Dumb-Fucks. The debates on various tv shows (and are expected to in the near future) betrayed an abysmal lack of propriety on part of the sympathizers of the state.

As we had mentioned earlier, whether the gathering at the Ramlila grounds was lawful or not must be considered irrelevant here. Even if the gathering was there hatching a political conspiracy against the central government, and even if the gathering comprised of young adult males between ages 18 and 40, and even if it was at 12-noon, the action by the police was plain wrong.

The court and many of the Congress leaning panelists opined that despite police aggression Baba Ramdev and his followers should not have offered even token resistance; and this in our view is an contemptuously evil and utterly complete subversion of any sense of justice. Such self anointed moaralists would have advocated even a semblance of a token resistance by the gathering in Jalian Wala Bagh as wrong and immoral. Is it a surprise that Mohandas recommended to the Jews, during their calamitous days, that they should surrender to their enemies and achieve a moral victory! It is the same Mohandas who, after annointing himself as Truth-embodiment, pledged that the country could be divided only on his dead body, and yet lived on shamelessly for months after the bloodiest partition in the history. Similarly, all those who advocate implicit trust in the morality of the Congress led UPA will do well to remember that during emergency, the police, under orders from higher ups, was force-feeding human and animal excreta to many of the jailed politicians from the opposition. The deserter wind-bag from the BJP will know better! We have had enough of these hypocrites. It is high time we spotted them and socked them as well.

Coming back to the issue:

1. The simple fact is that Baba Ramdev had been squatting along with his supporters in the Ramlila Maidan for a few days and the whole administration was in the KNOW that this was so.

2. There had been not even a whiff of a hint of a shred of a trace of a clue of violence during all the duration while the gathering was squatting there.

3. Regarding the police action, there are only two possibilities, viz., it was planned or it wasn't planned.

3a. If police did not plan the action then they are responsible for the tragedy for it is their DUTY to come prepared with a plan. For the police, failing to plan is same as planning to fail, and that betrays sheer incompetence.

3b. If the police did make a plan then it MUST have been in their plan to make an authentic video-recording of the COMPLETE action that followed and produce such a recording as evidence of their innocence.

4. Similarly, the police acted under orders from the higher authorities, or they acted on their own.

4a. If the police acted on their own then the whole contingent that was involved has to be tried for the brutal crime.

4b. If the police acted under orders from the higher authorities then those members must also be included in the accused list and tried for the brutal crime.

5. The whole chain of command deserves exemplary punishment.

All other issues are plainly irrelevant. We ALL know that our legislature and executive are utterly CORRUPT. To believe that the Judiciary is free from corruption is pure naivete. It is no use deluding ourselves. We need a Hindu reawakening. Also, we Hindus need to fight for New Constitution, and for that we need new leaders.