Yeddy! Are you Ready, then become pro-Hindu? Keshubhai! Get Modi-fied?

Yeddy! Are you listening? Are you ready? Listen carefully, we asked: "are you ready?"; and not: "are you Reddy?". Keshubhai! Are you listening? Are you Modified? Listen carefully, we asked: "are you Modi-fied?" and not: "are you modified?"

The above lines summarize the dilemmas faced by BJP leaders B S Yeddiurappa and Keshubhai Patel, as well as solutions to the dilemmas. Yeddy brought Karnataka BJP to power, and Keshubhai brought Gujrat BJP to power. After that the stories diverged. Keshubhai was replaced by Modi-bhai; while Yeddy was replaced by DVS Gowda.

We are not going to discuss the administrative capabilities of the four here. We assume that barring Modi, the rest are just a dash better than Congress persons. In India, since the Law-makers "run" the government, they are always unequal to the job that they must actually be doing, that is, Law-making or Policy making. On this count, all of these jokers, like the rest of the rotten lot, are sinners and they do not even realize that they are sinners. Our Constitution itself is the Devil's manual on this count; and our politicians deem it the Holy-Book. It indeed is like other Holy-Books, we mean, the ones which originated in the middle-east. But let that be the topic for another day.

In terms of being anti-Hindu, Modi qualifies (as of now) as the least anti-Hindu amongst them. DVS Gowda is the most anti-Hindu (for DVS Gowda's version of Hindutva, see here) amongst them. Yeddy and Keshubhai have been exhibiting signs of Secularism of late. For example, Keshubhai is collaborating with Sanjay Joshi while Yeddy sang the praises of Sonia and Pranab quite recently.

The main problem with BJP ministerial aspirants is that they have stupidity entwined into their genetic helix. They climb the tree of power using the ladder of Hindus and once they are in the vicinity of fruits they kick the ladder, imagining that they will never have to climb down! They think that using the "elevator" of Secularism is more efficient and they have no need of the ladder any more. Thus, every once in a while when they "fall down", they rush to their elevator!

However, all of them miss the main point. The ladder of Hindutva and the elevator of Secularism, bot stand on the shoulders of Hindus! The former on right-hearted Hindus and the latter on wrong-minded Hindus. Hindus come in three varieties: The right-hearted: These are the grass root workers. Wrong-minded: These are anti-Hindu leaders. And, both right-hearted as well as wrong-minded: The pesudo-Hindu leaders. In terms of political strategy, therefore, it is high time that Hindus destroyed Secularism and made Sanatana Dharma both ladder and the elevator.

Hindu leaders are at liberty to fight like dogs to gain power, but they should be given no liberty to sacrifice Hindus! They should sacrifice their petty egos for Hindus; or they should be ready to be sacrificed by the Hindus.

O you stupid politicians carrying Hindu names! Don't you, even once, feel a sense of responsibility? Don't you realize that you are all like an evil 45 year old man who rapes his own mother who is 70 years old? The mother who nurtured him. If you don't see this, we earnestly wish that you all experience much worse than what you are inflicting on your mother.

Yeddy, if you want to replace Gowda, don't grovel before Sonia and Pranab. That will not lead you anywhere. In fact it will not even lead you to nowhere. Rather it will lead you to your political doom. To replace Gowda, become READY to be pro-Hindu. Challenge Gowda on his stand on Made-Snana as well as his lack of stand on Karnataka Forum for Dignity which organized the on-road day-light cow-slaughter. Ditto Keshubhai, "Josh(i) se nahin, Hosh(iyari) se kaam lo". Forget Joshi, don't oppose Modi, become more Modi-fied than Modi himself.

What kind of Prime Ministerial candidate should we look for?

The pseudo Seculars, the Truly Seculars and the pseudo-Hindutva have voiced their self-reassuring fake-confident opinions about what qualities we need in a Prime Ministerial Candidate. And as usual most are blabbering the old stereotypes regarding "secularism", "inclusivism", "social-justice" and such bull-shit.

The biggest failure of these stupid self annointed wise men is that they are not only wrong in their answers, they almost always also ask wrong questions. It is stated about a scientist (Wolfgang Pauli) of an earlier generation that when he was told about some theory of some other person, he commented: It is not even wrong! Many of our fake wise men are just that, they are not even wrong! A nation goes through various time periods and if due considerations are not given to the space-time-context many questions related to national well being would be irrelevant.

Just as an example, if India, Pakistan, China, Bangladesh were all wealthy nations yearning to form a South Asian Union, we could have, just for fun, elected a cute looking Johny Lever as our Prime Minister provided he was willing to marry, let's suppose, Pakistan's Prime Ministerial candidate Veena Malik. And the duo would have offered humor and glamor for the audience of all these four nations who would be clamoring for entertainment after a day's hard work. Unfortunately our so called leaders are too dumb to realize that the reality is much different from this, as of now.

Presently the situation in India is extremely grim. And while the situation demands urgent attention those in the government are busy merely surviving. The one thing that we need, and it might sound a truism, is "leadership". Right now, we do not have leaders. We only have restaurant-stewards.

Let us illustrate it with an example. Let us say we are on a journey and we feel famished and therefore visit a restaurant, dhaba or whatever. Our first question would be: What do you have on your Menu, what is "special" here, etc.? Instead of precise answers if the waiter replies in general terms, for example: "We prepare the best healthy and nutritious food, whatever you order we serve it here", we would be extremely impressed, and order our favourite, say some XYZ. And then, if to our chagrin after inexplicable delays, what we receive is some ABC (different from XYZ) and that too badly made, we would be furious and highly dissatisfied. And suppose this repeats many times, then what would our reaction be? On any of our subsequent journeys, we would rather visit a place which has ready-made food items on display, which we can order and get immediately. And if we are satisfied we would visit such places again.

Now consider this: All Secular, Social Justice and Inclusive leaders are running those abominable restaurants and dhabas. They have no Menu, only promises of "best quality hygienic, nutritious and tasty food" which have time and again turned out to be horrendously empty. Then, who should we choose? Would we not go for someone who has "something tangible" to offer, even if it is NOT the best possible thing?

We are in a situation wherein, as we mentioned, we need "leadership" and "decision-making" and then "acceptance of responsibility for those decisions". We need leadership in terms of "ideas" which will "solve" the problem; not some stupid, mostly unworkable, platitudes. A preferably demonstrated ability for such is the bare minimum.

Nitish Kumar, despite all his fluffy and inflated ego is merely a Lalu-Yadav-quality photocopy of the original that he is striving to emulate. This is the reason he proposes Affirmative-Action even for the post of PM, by stating that the PM must preferably come from a poor state. This fool does not realize that this is what Manmohan and his Congress are trying to do internationally! Manmohan wants to become an international leader and therefore wants to make India a poor nation! This is what Jawahar et al. did for decades! Such arrogant asses do not have the quality of even ordinary sports-persons who at least utter the words: "May the best player win", before a match. Jokers such as these must be shunned. We have had more than enough of Mulayams, Mayawatis, Lalus, Jayalalithas, Naveen Patnayaks and so on. We have had enough of Jawahar-clone Rajdharma upholders too.

Further, as we stated, we need to choose someone who comes closest to fulfilling such criterion, even if we have none who foots the bill completely. Performance and not mere Promises should count. And no bull-shitting of undisclosed secret recipes as solution to national problems. Manmohan had promised arrest of price rise in 100 days, it is about 2000 days over now. Those who do not put forth specific ideas, those who are afraid of debating their solutions in public, those who hurl platitudes thoroughly failed concepts of Secularism, Social-Justice, Inclusiveness etc., and also those who are poor caricatures of the original must be outrightly rejected.

Lest our readers get the impression that we are slipping in Narendra Modi. We reiterate that Modi is merely the best available choice. He is about OK, surely not good. We might concede though that he is the least anti-Hindu of them all, as of now. Very recently, we read a beautiful piece on Kalyan Singh. By the standards of the wind-bag Hajpeyi, Kalyan Singh may not have followed Rajdharma, but as the author points out, he still stands the tallest. Shri Narendra Modi, are you listening? You have nothing to learn from Hajpeyi and Advani, but if you really want to learn, take the initial lesson from Kalyan Singh.

As Hindus we need a pro-Hindu PM.

Rashid Alvi and Congress Strategy

Many people are expressing surprise that Congress spokes person Rashid Alvi has called Mulayam Singh an agent of the BJP. In fact Congress too has expressed surprise and has distanced itself from the comment, claiming that Rashid Alvi was not authorized to make any such statement on behalf of the party.

Before we go any further we would like to relate a Panchatantra like story: There used to be a fox in a jungle which was famed to be very accurate in predicting the gender of the baby which would be born to any jungle-couple. The predictions used be correct all the time! Then a rabbit decided to investigate the matter. It made a list of couples who were expecting a child birth in their families and went with each of them to the fox. On each occasion the fox said some thing, a male birth or a female birth. After the delivery, some of them were found to be different from what the fox had predicted. However the fox claimed that it might have been a slip of the tongue and it would have to rfer to its diary where it wrote the "correct" prediction. And invariably the diary would contain the "correct" prediction.

We are sure that our wise readers have guessed the plot. The fox used to make a prediction (say A) for a couple and would write the opposite (if A was male then female and vice versa) in its diary. Thus if the oral prediction came correct, the fox would get credit for correct prediction directly and otherwise it would get its credit after the diary was referred to.

Now this is any body's guess that Congress (and many parties like it) have played this foxy role for a long time. We will return to this issue later in the article again.

This statement from Alvi is to hedge against Mulayam doing a repeat U-turn to support Sangma! As we have said in an earlier post that both Cong-A and Cong-B are anti-Hindu and pro-Islam, they attach the biggest stigma to the charge of being an agent of Hindutva (however fake the Hindutva may in reality be). Note that the Cong-A gang has already started calling Nitish communal for his past association with BJP (a despicably Truly-Secular party). Thus for any member of either Cong-A or Cong-B everyone else except themselves are Hindu-agents (How much we wish that this was true!). The BJP has been branded as the permanent "communal" party, a tag that they should take pride in if they are pro-Hindu, however owing to their own pseudo-Hindu conscience they feel guilty and always strive to be Truly Secular.

However, "officially" the Congress has distanced itself from the Alvi-comment so that in the short run Mulayam is not sentimentally "hurt". If Mulayam indeed did another U-turn (however unlikely) then watch how Congress would claim (like the proverbial fox) that they always knew Mulayam was a BJP-agent!

If Congress is really serious on such matters it must either throw a person out of the party (or post) for some large period for indiscipline. However the Congress would not do it, for Alvi is a part of the strategy. Exactly like the DogVijay, the stinking mouth Manish Tewari, etc. Recall that when Abhishek Manu Singhvi was caught in camera practicing love in the premises where law is to be practiced, he "resigned" from his position and stays resigned. However the foul mouth Manish Tewari called Anna Hazare deeply drenched in corruption, but he was away for merely a few days. Similarly DogVijay called Baba Ramdev a thug (a cheat) but was never chastised, however he has been chastised for calling Mamata immature and erratic.

This shows that Congress takes getting caught indulging in promiscuity more seriously than making false allegations against common people. Please note that Congress does not take promiscuity per se very seriously. It is the getting caught which is the issue. However getting caught making horrendously evil and vile statements is no issue with the Congress.

There is one difference between the Congress and the proverbial fox though. The fox used to make a mere double game. Congress plays multi-mouth games. Thus on any matter, there will be a large number of arbitrary voices from them. If their adversary is weak, it will be bulldozed. If the adversary is smart, Congress will detach itself from arbitrarily large number of such comments, claiming that they are the personal opinions of the comment-makers. And when the truth emerges, Congress will quote that person who was closest to the emerging truth (remember that if there are 50 possibilities and 100 different people spanning all options surely a few would have exhibited the correct option), and then claim that it was right all along.

Please notice that therefore Congress always (more often than not) makes its final official statement, almost after something has happened. Recall that Manmohan spoke about four days after the Ramlila Maidan pogrom where Congress stooge-police lathi-charged and killed Rajbala.

Rashid Alvi's statements should also be seen in this light.

NDA's electoral loss in 2004 elections and its "Truly Secular" analysis!

Intelligent persons always attempt to learn from the past. Thus the attempt to understand from the loss in 2004 and 2009 is certainly a desirable thing.

There are certain "truly Secular" leaders in the country who think that if Modi had been dismissed post 2002 events, then NDA would have come back to power in 2004. Let us take a look:

1. This means that the "truly Secular" leaders have no moral stand. They choose everything on the basis of winnability in the elections. Therefore if they perceive that a bigger 1984-like-riot will help them win an election, they will go for it. More over, this also makes the biggest shortcoming of present Indian Democracy abundantly clear, that Democratic Governance in India is NOT about providing leadership to the peoples, it is about "winning elections".

2. Modi could have possibly been dismissed in 2002, but NOT for the reasons that the "truly Secular" are citing. The only reason for Modi's removal could have been the massacre of 250 innocent Hindus at the hands of Gujarat Police, and his failure in protecting the innocent men, women and children traveling in the Sabarmati Express who were incinerated at Godhra, burnt alive as a result of a meticulously planned and cold-bloodedly executed act by the Islam-inspired Jihadis. Incidentally the "truly Secular" leaders have been criticizing  Modi  for not apologizing to the Jihadi-sympathisers, completely disregarding the real people deserving Modi's apology . The right thing for Modi is to apologize to Hindus for his above mentioned two failures.

3. The "truly Secular" leaders think that Modi failed to uphold the "Rajdharma" a "crime" for which Atal B. Hajpeyi chided Modi. However, as we observed in a recent post, that the record of "truly Secular" leaders in upholding "Rajdharma" is not significantly better than the out-right anti-Hindu Seculars. Anti-Hindu Seculars uphold Rajdharma by massacring Sikhs (as in 1984) and Truly-Seculars uphold their Rajdharma by surrendering to Jihadis and sending them money as well as releasing their comrades. We must HATE such Rajdharma.

Many of the pseudo-Hindu leaders scream like cry-babies against what they term "vote-bank" politics. What they fail to realize is that they squander their own "vote bank", which is bigger than any vote bank that they can ever imagine, by their "truly Secular" actions.

A genuinely Hindu leadership should not shy away from the realpolitik. As in well known, the vote bank is also known by a more respectable term - "constituency". Serve your constituency and then seek their votes. Your constituency is not your keep. Deceive it and it will deceive you into oblivion. Be loyal to it and they will be loyal to you.

Further, Hindus need to be educated and made politically aware and conscious for this constituency to emerge from its slumber. Opportunistic use of slogans like "Ram Temple" and then equally capricious rejection of it in favor of a new buzzword like "Ram Rajya" will hold no water. Hindus may be lazy, they may often be unbelievably tolerant, but Hindus are not FOOLS. Respect their intelligence and you will have their blessings (and votes!).

Presently there are only three power axes in India's politics: Congress, Third Front and The Void! Hindus need to fill that Void.

Since there is a collection called the "third front" (which in reality is much worse than a third-rate front), we presume that analysts think that Congress is the "First front" (in reality the first effront), and the BJP is the second front (in reality a second-rate Congress). For convenience, let us continue with this presumption.

Congress claims itself to be Secular (read anti-Hindu and opportunistic) by definition. The third front claims itself to be anti-Communal (read anti-Hindu and even more opportunistic) again by definition. The BJP claims itself to be Nationalistic (read pseudo-Hindu, aspiring to be Secular, and always failing in opportunism!) while ideologically it represents only a void.

There is an unwritten understanding between the Congress and the Third Front to keep BJP out of power; or in the worst case keep it under Secular veto. The BJP, however much they may claim to uphold Hindutva, and the RSS however much  they may claim to be "Hindu", fail to see this simple truth. Therefore, however much we may let our hearts bleed for the hearts of RSS and BJP workers, our heads must endlessly roll in laughter at the supidities of the headless BJP and RSS.
 

Further, this third-rate front has one particular character, and that is: When Congress is in power they oppose Congress, however when Congress does not have "the mandate" this third-front forms government with Congress support. Thus if Congress alliance can be termed Cong-A the third-front with outside support from Congress can be termed Cong-B. Both the Congress and the third-front hope that power must be in the hands of either of these, viz., Cong-A and Cong-B.

However, in 1998-1999 there was a twist. After the drama of H D Deve Gowda and Inder Gujral, BJP got about 200 seats. They should have formed a government on their terms. However, owing to headlessness of BJP, they made a "truly Secular" alliance, the NDA. And for this, they put the Ram Temple, Article 370 and the Hindutva issue on the back-bench. That was the beginning of the end of BJP's rise. While the right thing would have been to form a truly pro-Hindu alliance, they went in for "truly Secular" alliance! And thus, this became, what one might term as Cong-C. And no wonder that they lost badly in 2004 and 2009. After all why would people vote for a C-team when A and B teams are available?

Since 2014 seems unfavorable for Cong-A, Cong-B has stepped up its efforts to take over the seat. Nitish et al. are attempting tto become a consensus candidate for Cong-B.

In our opinion, the right strategy for a Hindu-alliance is to be boldly Hindu. And they must expose Congress and third-front as Cong-A and Cong-B. The Hindu-alliance must tell the people (and politics surely involves communicating with the masses and so you had better learn it!) that if people want any real change they must reject Cong-A and Cong-B together, otherwise they will keep having Congress directly or Congress by proxy! And this Hindu-alliance must present itself as a genuine alternative. 

The present obsession with "development" has to be viewed in proper perspective. Western European nations are "developed" but they are losing their civilizational war to Islam! Therefore, we should stay away from such foolish ventures, viz., "development alone"! Further, promises of Social-Justice (read massive wealth-redistribution from productive people to unproductive people), and Inclusiveness (read Affirmative Action) which  mandates that sub-standard and low-quality persons must be preferred in employment, promotion, etc., must be perceived with utmost suspicion and must be comprehensively rejected. Fair, responsible and informed charity for the deserving is a much better way.


Another important aspect in the strategy is to substitute the discussion on "Secularism" with a discussion on Islam, and Jihad. The Secularists and Social-Justice enthusiasts have been harping on what they term "Manuwadi forces". It is high time that  discussions on Islam, Christianity, etc., are arranged and their imperialist and extermination-of-the-other aspects are brought to the fore. The people are sufficiently educated about "Manuwad", and now must also be educated on "Koranwad" and "Biblewad". And the Hindu-alliance need not hassle its brains. A formidable collection of material is available on the web.

O Hindus, realize that you need to become politically aware and conscious. So you need to choose and elect new politicians from among yourselves who will represent your interests. Make new politicians, make new political parties. Encourage people amongst you with spine to become your representatives. Refuse to be led and manipulated by a bunch of Mohandas and Jawahar clones. These clones will lead you to your doom! Say NO to them.

If you do not find able leaders, become ones, at least strive to become ones, and also work towards making abler future leaders. Fill The Void in political space, and save yourselves!