"Religion of Non-Violence" vs "Religion of Peace"

Have you been following the developments in Myanmar (formerly Burma) as much as you do the events in Assam? If not, we recommend you do. Muslims from Bangladesh etc. immigrate into India and Muslims from Bangladesh and Thailand immigrate into Myanmar. While Indian Leaders are always bending over backwards to Muslim sensitivities; their Burmese counterparts, notwithstanding their religious allegiance to "Non-violence" are treating the members of "Religion of Peace" the way they need to be treated, as the other and as aggressors.

Myanmar, all our proud Leftist would know, was ruled by military junta and has recently turned into an Electoral Democracy. Our proud Seculars will note that Myanmar's majority population is Buddhist. Suu Kyi is the force behind Democracy and Human Rights in Myanmar. Now what happens when Buddhism, the Religion of Non-Violence and Islam, the Religion of Peace meet? Blood, mayhem and civil strife!

If you search Google News for Myanmar and Rohingya for past month you get this and this. We recommend our readers to peruse casually among the list and understand the situation.

The epitome of democracy in Myanmar, Aung San Suu Kyi is being accused of indifference. The epitome of "World Peace" OIC (Organization of Islamic Countries) want her to help Rohingya Muslims. Peaceful Citizens from the Holy Land of Islam, Pakistan, yes you guessed it right, the Taliban have threatened Burma. You must understand that this is a "peaceful" threat. International Leftists are shouting at roof tops against the injustice. But the Burmese Leaders insist that Rohingyan are not their citizens.

Why do our "intellectuals" answer when faced with an innocent question like: Why is it that wherever there is large scale violence, usually Muslim populations are involved? They quickly answer: Because All over the World the Muslims are discriminated against for being "Peaceful". When "human rights" of members of "Religion of Peace" are violated, they stage a small protest. Don't they have a right to even protest? These moronish intellectuals completely obfuscate the point that the mere existence anywhere of a non-Muslim is a human-right violation of a Muslim! They ignore the fact that the UN Human Right standards are violated by the dictats of Islam. For starters, Islam advocates death penalty for apostacy while the Human Rights Charter grants "Freedom of Religion", thus the two are inherently incompatible.

The Burmese know that they need to defend themselves, and they do not mind violating the principle of Non-violence taught by the Buddha. However, our "pussy-intellectuals" want us to honor the Mohandasian non-violence even at the risk of Civilizational Suicide! Of course, you must ask where these intellectuals live? Do they live in Muslim dominated localities with having to suffer 5 times braying everyday, or do they live in posh silent localities protected by the lives and blood of Hindu Security Personnel? The answer is obvious. This is exactly what V. S. Naipaul told the pussy-intellectual Dilip Padgaonkar (see here):

Naipaul: ...What is happening in India is a mighty creative process. Indian intellectuals, who want to be secure in their liberal beliefs, may not understand what is going on, especially if these intellectuals happen to be in the United States. But every other Indian knows precisely what is happening: deep down he knows that a larger response is emerging even if at times this response appears in his eyes to be threatening. 

However, we are aware of one of the more cynical forms of liberalism: it admits that one fundamentalism is all right in the world. This is the fundamentalism they are really frightened of: Islamic fundamentalism. Its source is Arab money. It is not intellectually to be taken seriously etc. I don't see the Hindu reaction purely in terms of one fundamentalism pitted against another. The reaction is a much larger response... Mohamedan fundamentalism is essentially negative, a protection against a world it desperately wishes to join. It is a last ditch fight against the world. ...

Also

Padgaonkar: My colleague, the cartoonist, Mr R K Laxman, and I recently travelled thousands of miles in Maharashtra. In many places we found that noses and breasts had been chopped off from the statues of female deities. Quite evidently this was a sign of conquest. The Hindutva forces point to this too to stir up emotions. The problem is: how do you prevent these stirred-up emotions from spilling over and creating fresh tensions?

Naipaul: I understand. But it is not enough to abuse them or to use that fashionable word from Europe: fascism. There is a big, historical development going on in India. Wise men should understand it and ensure that it does not remain in the hands of fanatics. Rather they should use it for the intellectual transformation of India.

This Hindu reawakening, which is on going, is to be whole-heartedly supported. Subramanian Swamy's idea of disenfranchising those Muslims who refuse to admit Hindu-ancestry and Modi's idea of Development are merely preliminary stepping stones. We must consider them, admire them, and possibly even implement them. However, we must not stop with them, we need to go further, without fear and without guilt, and work towards Sanatana Bharat.

Gutter Mouth DogVijay Singh Speaks on Communalism, Ignores State Incompetence!

What, in your expectation, will come out of the gutter? Fecal matter, you'd reply at once. So it is. The DogVijay Singh has opened his gutter mouth and ejected the same stuff again. This time accusing the BJP of communalizing Assam Violence (see here and here). The turd-between-the-ears preceptor of Congress's blue-gene prince forgets conveniently that it is people of his ilk who have given "inverse communal color" to Gujarat's anti-Hindu police action in 2002. Recall that about 250 Hindus died in police action. The dead were among the people who were protesting peacefully against the monsters who had torched sleeping travelers of Sabarmati Express wherein the travellers included significant numbers of senior citizens, women and children. Anti-Hindu parties have termed even a peaceful protest against such blatant anti-Hindu violence as pogrom against the minorities! Such is the poison of Secularism.

The people who, since the time of their ancestors whose illegitimate intellectual progeny they are, have been worried about Fascism and Nazism while callously, conveniently and completely ignoring the massacre of about 80,000,000 Hindus and equally large number of rape-victims among Hindus by the practitioners of "religion-of-peace" Islam. Not to forget the Goan inquisitions and Churchian atrocities on the Hindus. And, dear readers, we need to remember that the onslaught is ongoing with anti-Hindu state and media support.

The problem of illegal immigrants in Assam has been known for a long time. The whole movement of Akhil Assam Gana Sangram Parishad had started on this plank, and DogVijay's Don, the father of DogVijay's hallowed student, had signed an accord with them. Immigration is a problem, and illegal immigration is a bigger problem. 

On one hand, atrocities on Hindus in Pakistan and Bangladesh makes them flee their countries and seek refuge in India in exactly the same manner as Hindus from the Indian-state of Kashmir are forced to seek refuge in their own mother nation. The followers of religion of peace are indulging in ethno-religious cleansing of their countries. The gutter-mouth and his ilk are too scared to talk on those issues, calling this rabid fear their "sensitivity" for minority sentiment.

On the other hand, Muslim-immigrants, legal as well as illegal, from Pakistan as well as from Bangladesh, are entering India only to wage a Jihad against one of the oldest, if not the oldest, religions in the world. And lo and behold, even a token resistance against this Islamic expansion is being termed as an attack on "Secularism" and being called "Communalization of the issue"!

The central question to ask is: What does the State exist for, if not at the very least, to protect its citizens againt foreign invasion? If DogVijay's heart bleeds so much for the Muslim refugees from Pakistan and Bangladesh, then why does he not spend a fraction of his own money and spend it on charities in those countries from where the Muslims are emigrating? And we emphasize the term "his own money" which we are sure is minscule. Most of his wealth, that he otherwise claims to own, is only the shadow of the ill gotten money that he and his illegitimate siblings have stashed in foreign banks.

We repeat: What does the State exist for, if not at the very least, to protect againt foreign invasion? 

Is Mao secessionism OK because it is in a BJP ruled state? Binayak Sen would comfort his behind on a membership of the National Advisory Committee, a committee which comprises of the strange bedfellows of the UPA chair-person. Is Kashmir secessionsim OK because it is being done by Muslims? Arundhati Roy, the spokesperson of the separatists, will be mollycoddled. Was Bhindrenwale OK because he was in an Akali Dal ruled state? And then did he turn into a "terrorist" because he turned against Indira Gandhi? Was Bodo agitation OK till it was against Akhil Akham Gana Sangram Parishad government? Has it become Evil now because it is in a Congress ruled state? 

Mr. DogVijay Singh, and you politicians of the Evil ilk, must understand that when the State fails to protect the rights of its citizens, it loses its legitimacy. You can not run a government as corrupt as your Manmohan Singh is running - Manmohan Singh who is a self-appointed-epitome-of-cleanliness while in actuality he is a leader of the pack of one of the most Evil and Corrupt government in India (second possibly only to Jawahar's government) - and yet accuse people of sedition if they protest. You can not call a Kejriwal a separatist for his suggestion that people should refuse to pay taxes. Kejriwal is infected with the poison of Secularism and that is bad enough, but you will never fault him on that, for you are infected with the same poison. You would not notice the "communalism" of the news that "Muslim MP's across all political parties combine to protest againt the 'Assam violence'". You and your ilk never combined together to protest againt the burning of the coaches of the Sabarmati Express, never staged a protest againt the killing of 250 Hindus by the Gujarat police. And of course you would call it Jawaharian ideal of Secularism.

Mr. DogVijay Singh, you and your ilk deserve on your heads loads and loads of what you have between your ears, namely undiluted poisonous fecal matter. And that would only be a trailor of the beginning of the trailor of the full movie to come. Ishwara that you do not believe in won't protect you and the Allah that you believe in can't protect you.

Karnataka BJP in Crisis Again? No. It was never out of Crisis!

The trouble is not that Pranab Murkhaji has become the president elect. The trouble is not even that there was cross voting in BJP, after all BJP's allies openly defied the NDA guideline. Further, when P.A. Sangama was seeking "conscience vote" he should have considered the possibility that he might lose "conscience vote". Then what is the matter? The story in brief:

Ananthkumar (the snake under whose shadow Karnataka BJP has become a Devdasi), the manipulator, has been trying to puppetteer the state government. He can hardly win the state elections on his own, but he likes to "control" all that moves in the state. Well, to be fair to him, he may in turn be manipulated by the BJP-high-command!

Sometime in 2008-09, BSY was about to be sacrificed (like the giant Kalyan Singh was sacrificed for Hajpeyi's frothing-at-the-mouth-againt-Manuwadis sister Mayawati) for the bigamous Kumaraswamy. We suspect that was an insider job. However after HDK deceived BSY, the assembly was dissolved and the people of Karnataka (or do we say Lingayats of Karnataka) gave a comfortable majority to the BJP.

As an aside, albeit it is true that BSY has support of, possibly, only Lingayats; this should be no surprise. Not even, Jawahar, whose false glory is sung time and again by his backside comforters, had a uniform and homogenous support across all "vote banks"! The biggest stalwarts in Indian politics thrive on support of their small yet chosen vote-banks, usually Muslims, and then Yadavs, Dalits and so on. So no point in grudging BSY his vote-bank. But possibly, Anantkumar grudges that! And there begins the inside job, or the subterfuge!

BSY was made to resign for maintaining the "clean image" of the BJP. Then, Sadananda Gowda cheated BSY.  BSY, in his turn, exhibited adoloscent courage and womanly cowardice. He paraded his supporters to dislodge S. Gowda, and then started singing glories of Sonia . He was alleged to be contemplating splitting the BJP but then had no gall. Then, he started a rebellion, demanding Gowda's ouster. During the interregnum BSY also dabbled in praising Modi.

Unfortunately B S Yeddiurappa has come a full circle. Recall the cry-baby Yeddy of yore. We think, finally when he saw the toothless BJP surrendering abjectly to JD(U) and ShivSena, he decided to wedge his sword in to the wound. However, Yeddy must show manliness not cowardice.

The problem or the issue is not of dissent, the issue is of back-stabbing. Hindus have been unnecessarily tolerant of back-stabbers. Had BSY declared that a few of the MLA's will vote for Pranab at his behest, that would have been something else. There is also a possibility that Sadananda Gowda engineered a cross voting to malign BSY. If BJP can not find out who did the cross voting and can not throw them out, Similarly, if BJP can not be stern with its allies, especially the anti-Modi JD(U), then the BJP in its present form has to be summarily rejected. Let it join the cabal of rank anti-Hindu parties. 

This further establishes the need for a vertical split within the BJP, into those who are not anti-Modi and those who are anti-Modi, viz. those who are strongly anti-Hindu and those who are only mildly anti-Hindu. If the RSS has even a pea-sized brain, it must keep a list of 1000 fresh candidates ready. A list of those who will contest the next LokSabha elections on a Hindu platform. In the current political scenario, if RSS is even dreaming of a milder form of anti-Hindu alliance (pro-Hindu, or even a Hindu-neutral alliance seems too far fetched), it must mercilessly eject ambivalent and truly-Secular candidates. The Hindus need a new political party with a clear Hindu attitude.

In the mean while, political careers of a lot of people, especially the back-stabbers, need to be destroyed, at the very least they must be shown the door. If the RSS wants to avoid the NDA contesting the next general elections under JD(U) leadership, it needs to start an internal cleansing drive right now.

The problem of "Mad Chase for GDP Growth" can not be addressed by Snipe Hunt.

Usually we focus on political problems afflicting the Hindus. Recently it has become a fashion to sermonize on Development. Especially terms like Inclusive Growth are increasingly used to affect pretentious cloaks of Sagacious Wisdom. Thus, for a change, we take a small detour and tread on the subject of National Growth.

While Jawaharian ideals wrecked political havoc on the Hindus, their bastard children set the cat among the pigeons in their economic affairs. There is no dearth of "wise men" who pontificate on the ills afflicting the economy while their prescriptions for solutions rely on the magic of proverbial alchemy. In a recent article, Mad chase for GDP growth has been critically questioned. However, the article fails to point out fundamental lacunae in the solution strategies. Therefore the article goes on to suggest a rehash of old medicine in terms of replacing the "Old Plan" with a "New Plan". This is, in our opinion, the proverbial Snipe Hunt.

Six decades of Jawaharian propaganda has inculcated the false mantra of "Government must do something about it" as solution for all problems. The poor as well as the rich industrialists rely on subsidies/tax cuts. India has not liberalized its economy. It has converted Socialism into Crony Capitalism. The flawed thinking, euphemistically known as "Planned Economy", must be comprehensively rejected.

Chronic problems require radical solutions. Chronic problems engendered owing to long application of wrong ideas can only be cured by sustained application of better and right ideas. Planned Growth (whether GDP or otherwise) and Egalitarian Spread of Growth are both False Goals. The correct ideas are inter alia: Freedom and Responsible Behavior, and a summary Rejection of  "protection" and "subsidies". Protection and Subsidies must be available for none; neither for the rich nor for the poor! Keynes said "In the long run we are all dead"; and his remedies inflicted even more suffering than they sought to alleviate. The effect has been:"In the long run we all (well except Government cronies) suffer".

As long as "Central Planning" is worshipped as a god to be propitiated for economic prosperity, As long as unethical practices like "wealth redistribution" from the working population to the ultra rich (Crony Capitalism) and poor (Socialism) through misguided ideologies of "Panning for Growth" and "Affirmative Action" are practiced, As long as "Equality of Result" is desired in the name of "Equality of Opportunity", As long as Egalitarianism in held as an ideal, As long as fair discrimination based on Competence is vilified, As long as belief in "Free Lunch" is perpetuated in various guises, As long as mandating of Responsible Behavior is vilified as "Bourgeoisie Exploitation", The solution to any of the problems mentioned in the said article can never even be attempted.

In terms of economics, the Government should do what it does the best, Nothing! We must wake up to the fact that the Government almost always has the anti-Midas touch; whatever the Government touches turns into turd, and you can't polish turd! People do not need to be saved by the Government, they need to be saved from the Government! Give the people Freedom and they will solve their problems. They may take a little while to wake up from delusional hopes in Jawaharian solutions, but wake up they will, as wake up they must.

Narendra Modi's ignorance ... on Mohandas

The more we notice the rampant, callous and dangerous ignorance in our politicians, the more we feel compelled to repeat our clarion call to the Hindus. While murderously anti-Hindu Secularist and evil farthest-left Socialist politicians never tire of screaming the patent falsehood that Modi is "extreme-right-wing" "Hindutwa-vadi"; we are deeply worried about Modi's increasing anti-Hindu pro-Mohandas leanings. We not only suspect his "right-wing-ness" (Crony-Capitalism is NOT right-wing), we have also questioned his pro-Hindu-ness. Recall that he has not apologized for the 250 Hindus killed by the Gujarat Police.

Many self annointed Hindutva-vadis already exist in the obscenely large number of Mohandasian-Jawaharian anti-Hindus. Starting with the wind-bag Hajpeyi to the latest additions of Keshubhai and Sanjay Joshi.

Keshubhai is betraying senility by worrying about Modi's autocratic reign of fear. Keshubhai seems to prefer Islamic reign of terror and fear, a la Mumbai 26/11. If this is not senility, we do not know what is.

Does Keshubhai have the guts or even merely the clarity, to say that Modi has been unable to evoke sufficient terror and fear in the hearts of Islamic Terrorists?

Sanjay Joshi is orchestrating his supporters, notwithstanding his own hypocritical and false denials, to publish posters in his own favor and against Modi. Funnily, most posters read "Tute man se koi bada nahin hota ... Kaho Dil Se Sanjay Joshi Phir Se", meaning "None becomes greater by breaking hearts, Say with heart we want Sanjay Joshi again". Sanjay Joshi and his morons have forgotten that a similar attempt to keep the "heart" united led to a Bloody Massacre during Partition of India. The land mass with India did NOT increase with that partition. Despite losing that land mass, we gained no peace. And this moron Sanjay Joshi wants to embrace the same Islam-appeasing Secularism.
 

Does Sanjay Joshi have the clarity or even merely the heart to say that he did not mind his heart being broken so long as India, as the land for Hindus, remained unbroken?

Have Keshubhai or Sanjay Joshi, notwithstanding their RSS association, ever said that however much they might oppose Modi they oppose Mohandas, Jawahar, Secularism even more? Have they ever said that their allegiance is to Hindus and their opposition to Modi is under a Hindu umbrella. And we emphasize: "Hindu" umbrella, and not the Namby Pamby Hindutva of truly-Secular morons. 

Mark our words, such platitude rattlers are shameless and ruthless power seekers who - never mind how "simple" they are in their clothings and visible life-styles - will compromise Hindu interests for their personal survival. Yes, being RSS pracharaks they may have some goodness in their hearts, but their heads, especially as far as Hindu-interests are concerned, are completely empty, nay poison-filled!

So much so for the suckers, but what does the alleged "terror-inspiring extreme-right-wing Hindutwa-vadi" do? He credits Gujarat's success to Mohandasian model (see here)! 

Worse still he thunders:  

The change in Gujarat happened because every Gujarati feels that he is part of the development process. The freedom struggle existed even before Gandhi. But it was Gandhi who made it a mass movement and made every individual aware of his role in the freedom struggle. He made even simple actions like weaving, sweeping and boycott of foreign clothes relevant to freedom struggle. Similarly Gujarat's success lies in public participation," said Modi.

Mr. Narendra Modi, you must read the following carefully! 

Mohandas DID NOT make freedom struggle a mass movement, rather he was foisted upon the mass movement by clever British Public Relation Machinery to strengthen the counter-revolution called Congress.

If Modi does not realize that then he must be like those Gujju regionalism afflicted who think that Morarji Desai, the man who undermined India's nuclear program and intelligence services RAW, was a great PM. Such a Modi can never incite fear in the opponents of Hindus, rather he is well on his way to compromise Hindu-interests.

Mr. Modi, learn at the very least from Ramdas and certainly  not from Mohandas! If you do not know enough Hinduism, know at least this much of Islam. Know that Islam seeks to exterminate non-Islam and wants to bring the whole world under Islamic rule. We do not know if even Ramdas appreciated that but Modandas certainly did not, nay he callously ignored it. If you do not understand this simple reality then you too are one of those cuckoo-brained demagogues who advocate mass suicide to Hindus.

Dear readers, do you appreciate why we repeatedly and untiringly emphasize (see here and here) that Modi is NOT pro-Hindu. The only saving grace for him is that he is the least anti-Hindu among the present lot (rot?) of politicians. We wish him well, but he too needs to be beware and improve! However, a Hindu political resurgence (see here) and vertical split in Indian political theater (see here) are the need of the hour.