DogVijay about to be in the Docks?

This was expected, though we wonder why it took so long to happen. The scumbag, poisonous fecal matter between the ears, Digvijay Singh has been found to have visited a terror-accused. RSS has meekly demanded a probe. Investigations, even if they happen, will be manipulated by Manmohan (as he did in the 2-G case for tens of months) and the barker will manage to get a reprieve.

Thus, these steps are not enough. We must realize that when Digvijay Singh and Rahul Gandhi talk about Hindu-terror, they are referring to themselves and their partners in crime. Collusion and Connivance from the highest level of treacherous evil people masquerading as Secular Hindus with the real terror, Islamic terror.

If the moron Digvijay calls Abhinav Bharat and other Hindu organizations as propagators of saffron terror, then what are people of his ilk doing? The answer is obvious. They are propagating "tricolor-terror". Secular (fake-Hindus) combined with Muslims, Communists, and all the rest, working day in and night out against Hindus and India.

And now that this Muslims cleric of Bhopal has been caught, he must be given his favorite punishment, the Islamic punishment. Won't it be really a nice example of Secularism? A Digvijay Singh getting an Islamic punishment? He can hope to make it to the Islamic hall-of-fame of the Hadiths. More-over he can also hope to enjoy seventy-two pussy-cat dolls later.

Coming back to a deeper issue. Therefore it is important for we Hindus to realize and be aware that saffron terror may be bad, but tricolor-terror is much much worse. Saffron terror, if it exists, is a reaction to decades long tricolor terror.

As it is pointless to discuss Godhra-2002 without discussing the innocent women and children burnt alive in the two railway coaches at Godhra station; so it is pointless to discuss saffron-terror without discussing tricolor-terror.

Please also understand that Secular Hindus (Congress and Socialists), Muslims, and Naxalites (Maoists) are staging a fight amongst themselves, only with the aim of destroying Hindus and Sanatana Dharma. Each of them is a band in the tricolor, rather multicolor collage.

As Hindus, we must be absolutely clear and say NO to Secularism, Socialism, tricolor-terror and other such deceptions. Do not let the tricolor terrorists fool you in to believing the dangers of a non-existent saffron terror.

A Politician's Refusal to wear skull cap is an insult to Islam: So what?

Communists, Socialists and Muslims have this habit of pushing any civilized society on unnecessary defensive by their aggressive linguistic manipulations. The recent controversy on Narendra Modi's refusal to wear a skull cap offered by a Moslem cleric is a typical example. The Moslem cleric who offered the skull cap proclaimed that the refusal by Modi was an insult to Islam. Wow! That is great news. We are loving it! Islam deserves insults many more in number and much more in severity. After all it must get back what it has been giving until now to others.

Non-Muslims must keep in mind that Islam is universally contemptuous of anything other than Islam, Allah, Mahomet and Muslims. And it has been extremely severe in thought, word, as well as deeds. For the Hindus - the idolators - Islam has the choicest disdain. The Muslims do not even ever notice it! And Communists, Socialists, etc., are their partners in crime. In their hypocritical, nay deceptive tradition, all preachings whether of Secularism or Social Justice, are only for the Hindus. Their fingers point only at Sanatana Dharma and Hindus. Thus they will cry Secularism to subvert Secularism, cry Democracy to subvert Democracy, cry Class-inequality only to create a new Privileged-Class, and so on.

We must look at Moslems, Moslem clerics, Mayawati, Prakash and Brinda Karats, Laloo and Sharad Yadavs, Yechuries, with a very keen perception. And their bluff will atonce be obvious. If Islam, Communism, Social-Justice are feeling insulted more and more, they are merely beginning to get what they deserve!

We, as Hindus, must not fall prey to their linguistic manipulations; must have no default respect for terms like Secularism, Socialism, Social Justice and so on. We must boldly and openly declare and discuss the truth about all of these. Know and understand Islam for what it is, know and understand Secularism for what it is, and so on.

Refusing to wear skull cap is NOT that significant, however refusing to understand Islam IS significant. A Truth Modi will do well to know.

During his Sadbhavana fast Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi ruffled not a few feathers when he refused to wear the skull cap offered to him by a Moslem cleric. However encouraging the act may appear, we must not read much into it for Modi has some Secular (read Muslim Appeasement) inclinations. While we congratulate Modi for his refusal, we are not overly impressed by it. Rather we are disturbed by the following item.

In a recent interview to Society Magazine, Narendra Modi had this to say about terrorism:

One of the major achievements of the Modi government is its success at keeping terror at bay even though the state shares a boundary with Pakistan. Even as the Al Qaeda has administered a threat letter to Modi, he refuses to lend terrorism any religious association. He explains, "It is not in good taste to associate terrorism with any religion. Terrorism has no religion and you cannot associate it with humanity. Someone who is human can't be a terrorist. Only the one who ceases to be a human being becomes a terrorist."

This is the typical "No Religion is Bad" platitude. Modi is ignoring the possibility, which is the fact, that Islam teaches that Muslims alone are humans and therefore Muslims need not treat non-Muslims on par with humans.

So when he is projected as the "Hindutva" supporting "right-wing" candidate for the post of PM, it does not mean much. Further, he was also being compared to Sardar Patel in the same article as if Sardar Patel was some solid red-blooded Hindu. Let us look at Sardar Patel as well.

Sardar Patel in his speech had once said (quoted from wikipedia):

I fully appreciate the fears of our brothers from [the Muslim-majority areas]. Nobody likes the division of India and my heart is heavy. But the choice is between one division and many divisions. We must face facts. We cannot give way to emotionalism and sentimentality. The Working Committee has not acted out of fear. But I am afraid of one thing, that all our toil and hard work of these many years might go waste or prove unfruitful. My nine months in office has completely disillusioned me regarding the supposed merits of the Cabinet Mission Plan. Except for a few honourable exceptions, Muslim officials from the top down to the chaprasis (peons or servants) are working for the League. The communal veto given to the League in the Mission Plan would have blocked India's progress at every stage. Whether we like it or not, de facto Pakistan already exists in the Punjab and Bengal. Under the circumstances I would prefer a de jure Pakistan, which may make the League more responsible. Freedom is coming. We have 75 to 80 percent of India, which we can make strong with our own genius. The League can develop the rest of the country.

Here Sardar Patel seems to catch a glimpse of the "Nation of Islam" mentality of Muslims. However, he soon followed it up with a lame speech (quoted from the same wikipedia article):

Here, in this same city, the blood of Hindus, Sikhs and Muslims mingled in the bloodbath of Jallianwala Bagh. I am grieved to think that things have come to such a pass that no Muslim can go about in Amritsar and no Hindu or Sikh can even think of living in Lahore. The butchery of innocent and defenceless men, women and children does not behove brave men... I am quite certain that India's interest lies in getting all her men and women across the border and sending out all Muslims from East Punjab. I have come to you with a specific appeal. {boldface} Pledge the safety of Muslim refugees crossing the city. Any obstacles or hindrances will only worsen the plight of our refugees who are already performing prodigious feats of endurance. If we have to fight, we must fight clean. {boldface} Such a fight must await an appropriate time and conditions and you must be watchful in choosing your ground. To fight against the refugees is no fight at all. No laws of humanity or war among honourable men permit the murder of people who have sought shelter and protection. Let there be truce for three months in which both sides can exchange their refugees. This sort of truce is permitted even by laws of war. Let us take the initiative in breaking this vicious circle of attacks and counter-attacks. Hold your hands for a week and see what happens. Make way for the refugees with your own force of volunteers and let them deliver the refugees safely at our frontier.

Here the "Iron Man" is in the role of a soft appeaser masquerading as a reasonable man! What is the reputation of Islam in terms of "Laws of War"? Patel is completely ignorant about that. The Sardar is blissfully unaware what the founder and role-model of Islam did to Jewish tribes like Banu Qurayza. No reasonable dealings can ever happen with Islam! It is really really a pity that as far as Islam is concerned, Hindus have had only "Cotton-Men". There has been not a single "Iron Man". In the case of Sardar Patel as well, it looks as if he did not understand Islam for what it is. We are afraid that Modi will repeat the same mistake.

We need leaders who understand Islam for what it is. The text, the founder, its history and its role models. Without such an understanding the dangerous confusions will prevail and we Hindus will have to face their horrible consequences.

Refusing to wear skull cap is encouraging but NOT that significant. However, refusing to understand Islam for what it is, IS greatly significant. A greatly significant suicidal blunder!

As Hindus we must keep a very close watch on such matters, for it is a matter of survival. This is why we keep repeating that if there are not sufficiently Hindu leaders, don't despair, become ones!

O Hindus, realize that no politician is representing you! So you need to choose and send newer politicians from among yourselves. Make new politicians, make new political parties. Encourage people with spine to become your representatives. Otherwise you will be led by a bunch of Mohandas and Jawahar clones. And surely they will lead you to your doom!

Sardar Patel may have been much better than Jawahar, and yet he was NOT good enough. He did not understand Islam for what it is. Modi will do well to learn the truth.

Three Don'ts for Modi

The BJP viciously betrayed its voters in three ways when it came to power at the center.

1. First, it compromised on the Ram Janmabhoomi issue:

With coalition-constraints as the excuse, BJP under the sissy leadership of AB Vajpeyi (also called Hajpeyi) dragged its feet on the Ram Temple issue. Completely forgetting that its hundred-fold gain in parliamentary strength in 1999 (to about 200) from its 1980 strength (of about 2) was mainly due to the desire among the Hindus to give a self-proclaimed Hindu-favoring party some chance. Even if the BJP compromised for the sake of coalition, it must have fought the 2004 election on its owm manifesto, however ...

2. Second, it jumped onto the Development plank prefering it over its "Hindu plank":

After enjoying power for about five years on the support of Hindus (Ram-Bhaktas), it jumped into the election fray prematurely (at the behest of the "genius" Pramod Mahajan) with India Shining as its symbol for campaign. Its leadership thought that Hindu-votes were in its pockets while others had to be attracted! Its leaders started proclaiming that the structure demolition at Ayodhya was a "sad" incident, and so on.

3. Third, it surrendered on Terror and indulged in Minority Appeasement for "broadening vote base":

Kandahar episode was the lowest point in the test of spine of the BJP which always prioded itself as the hardliner party against Islamic terror. Its capitulation during this episode completely exposed the lack of conviction in its high leadership with Jaswant escorting hardcore terrorists in exchange for hostages. Further, instead of initiating a debate on Secularism and discrediting Secularism, it started to woo minorities by proclaiming itself to be truly-secular while accusing others of pseudo-secularism.

We are not dwelling on other important issues like sacrificing Kalyan Singh for Hajpeyi's fondness for Mayawati the megalomaniac; victimising Govindacharya, and Uma Bharati at the altar of BJP high-command. It is no wonder that the party fared very very badly. And it continues to fare badly except in pockets. And beware, its improved performance anywahere is more owing to rejection of the alternative (Congress) rather than any positive feeling towards the BJP. We hope that there are some heads in the BJP who understand this and will strive towards a change.

Fortunately Mr. Modi has been somewhat different on these issues. Even though he has focused on the development of Gujarat, he has maintained a pro-Hindu image. Even though he has always been villified as "merchant of death"; he has braved it all, and has never even once apologised for it. Gujarat 2002 was a subdued reaction by non-Muslims who were provoked by the true-Muslims. True-Muslims follow the exhortation of Islam to commit atrocities against non-Muslims; this they did by burning alive hundreds of passengers including women and children in coaches of Sabarmati Express at Godhra station. what followed was a understandable reaction. Modi could have hardly prevented it. Further preventing it would be like preventing spontaneous celebration by fans after India winning the cricket-world-cup! Recently Modi refused to wear the skull cap, drawing ire from the cleric who claimed the refusal to be an insult of Islam. Further, until now, Modi is unfazed by the criticism by some of the members of the NDA (like the DF Nitish Kumar)

In our opinion, any sensible leader must guard against the follwing three follies, and Hindus must assiduously watch on these things:

1. Obfuscating truth about Islam, 2. and 3. Emphasizing Secularism and Socialism respectively. Each of this is a subversion of Hindu India. Please note that the terms "Secular" and "Socialist" were introduced by Mrs. Gandhi via the 42nd amendment and were not enshrined in the original constitution. Thus, the original constitution, which was bad enough, was worsened by Mrs. Gandhi, and then later coverted to garbage (well almost) by Rajiv Gandhi.

Coming to Modi, he MUST guard against making the following mistakes (each of which can be potentially politically suicidal)

1. Apologizing for Gujarat 2002:

The whole media, the adversaries of the BJP as well as some of BJP's DF-allies like (Nitish Kumar JD) are all hell bent upon making him apologise for Gujarat 2002. Modi must realize that even if he is viewed as someone who was responsible for Gujarat 2002, he must be proud of it and not ashamed of it. Modi must never ever apologize for Gujarat 2002. If at all he does, he must apologize to the Hindus for having thwarted their legitimate reaction.

2. Islam and Minority Appeasement:

Notwithstanding anything Modi must avoid any appeasement postures with Muslims and Islam. He must clealy understand that there may be and are moderate Muslims but there is no moderate Islam. And usually the best Muslims are the Least Muslims. Modi must be clear in his understanding of Islam for what it is, rather than what Secularists want everyone to believe. Appeasement of Muslims must also be avoided. Anyone who offers him a skull cap must be asked to first bow to an idol of a Hindu god as a mark of respect to one of the accepted ways of spiritual progress in Hinduism. Modi must diligently steer clear of Islam and Minority Appeasement.

3. Dilution in his pro-Hindu image:

We do not find Modi a strong pro-Hindu politician. He has been better than many, however, he has also exhibited perilous vulnerabilities (for example see here). However, at whatever level is he known to be pro-Hindu, Modi must tenaciously guard against diluting his pro-Hindu stance.

Most people now realize and believe that Modi can deliver Development and Governance-Efficiency; however Hindus want to know if he can deliver a pro-Hindu government at the center. If he strives for this end, he would not only serve his own political ambitions, he will also serve the need of the hour of our nation. With such fervent hope we wish him all the very best. We also exhort Hindus to reject secular politicians like Nitish Kumar et al. Hindus must elect pro-Hindu politicians who can also deliver development and efficiency. Politicians like Nitish Kumar who are avowedly development-centric but Secular, are poisonous for our society. Islam is much more dangerous compared to under-development! Though we need development as well to protect ourselves against Islam's military misadventures.

Anna Reverts to His Dumb-Fuckery

In his latest burst Anna Hazare stated "Advani's rath yatra for votes, not for people".

We have the following question for Mr. Hazare:

What is wrong in pursuing votes?

India, currently has electoral democracy. And in ED "votes" are the thing! What is Anna's problem?

We think that Anna is fundamentally confused. He is unhappy with the system but he has no ideas about what changes to make in the system for a truly effective reform.

He keeps shouting that politicians are running behind votes, but he never proposes a solution to this. He proclaims that he believes in Democracy, himself practices autocracy, and dislikes votes. This is a typical example of a dumb-fuck. The inability to perceive, rather the intransigent unwillingness to perceive, the obvious. And then he will keep blabbering on Mohandasism and such non-sense. We hate to say this, and we are aware that we may be erring heavily, but he appears to be a cuckoo brained person.

Such Mohandasians are very very dangerous. The way the British used Gandhi to thwart national interests, Brown-British (Congress et al.) will use Hazare to thwart national interests.

Mere reveling in holier than thou attitude won't help much. Let him make explicit criticisms. If Anna is against politicians vying for votes, then he must have an alternative solution. Our apprehension is that if this Anna turns out to be second Mohandas, Kejriwal will be the second Jawahar and then ... Man we are doomed! So we need to keep a close watch on Annaesque DF-ery, and guard against getting swayed by his puerile rhetoric.