Advani's Half-Truths on Mumbai Blasts

As if to complement the stupidity of P Chidambaram, L K Advani spilled his pearls of wisdom. Addressing a press conference after visiting the injured he said:

It is a policy failure not intelligence failure. There have been repeated attacks on Mumbai, this is a failure of policy ...

What Advani fails to see is this inability to formulate an appropriate policy springs from the inability to understand the elementary truth that Islam is the problem. And this inability is inherent in the BJP as well.

Inability to understand is intelligence failure!

Of course, there is another graver possibility, and that is that there is willful negligence.

We wonder how these leaders want to be seen as: Unintelligent or Willfully Negligent!

Whatever be the case, Advani must stop parading his half-truths as pearls of wisdom.

It is high time that Hindus realized and acted upon the fact that Islam is the problem.

As the famous Dutch politician Geert Wilders has said repeatedly:

There may be moderate Muslims, but there is NO moderate Islam.

And Like Serge Trifkovic mentioned:

The best Moslems are generally the least Moslems (a pattern which does not seem to be the case with other religions)

Thus anyone, especially a leader, who does not see this simple fact is either a case of Intelligence Failure or Willful Negligence.

Advani must know better.

Chidambaram Blabbers On Mumbai Blasts

The ever suave venomous snake P Chidambaram has delivered pearls of wisdom again. In his remarks on the recent Mumbai Blasts, he said:

He accepted that this was "unfortunate" but said the new terror attack was "not an attack on India's commercial capital" and that it cannot be described as an intelligence failure because for 31 months, since 26/11 was unleashed upon Mumbai, the police and the government had managed to keep the city safe till last evening.

What wisdom! A cabinet minister from Congress which has ruled the country for over sixty years claims that securing a city for thirty one months is good enough! And it is not intelligence failure!

You empty skull, this is intelligence failure. You are refusing to see the writing which has been there for all to see, a writing not merely on the wall, rather the writing on the SKY!

Secularism is the problem. Islam is the problem. Appeasement is the problem.

A nation based on Hindu Way of Life (Sanatana Dharma) is the only solution.

If you can't figure this out, this is intelligence failure! Don't fool the nation with false concepts.

Islam's Latest Gift to Hindus: Blasts in Mumbai

Yesterday, on July 13, 2011, Islam was at it again, and its followers, ardent Muslims, sent their message for the n-th time, unmistakable signals that we seem to have decided to ignore, despite 1400 years of repeated messaging; and the message is:

1. The problem is not some misguided Muslims.

2. The problem is not those who have hijacked peaceful Islam.

3. The problems are not ambiguous concepts like Islmo-fascism, and so on.

4. Most importantly the problems are not, what our secular socialist politicians and media keep shouting from the roof-tops: the psychology, the national origin, the immigration status, the socioeconomic status, the marital status of a Muslim, whether he is born of cousin marriage or not, whether he is culturally alienated in the West or not, whether he is sexually frustrated or not, whether he is angry at Islam being "left behind" by the modern West or not, if he's a Muslim, then he is a candidate for Muslim extremist.

5. Because The Problem is Islam itself.

Take for instance another example:

The Muslims aren't happy!

They're not happy in Gaza. They're not happy in Egypt. They're not happy in Libya. They're not happy in Morocco. They're not happy in Iran. They're not happy in Iraq. They're not happy in Yemen. They're not happy in Afghanistan. They're not happy in Pakistan. They're not happy in Syria. They're not happy in Lebanon.

And where are they happy?

They're happy in England. They're happy in France. They're happy in Italy. They're happy in Germany. They're happy in Sweden. They're happy in the USA. They're happy in India.They're happy in Norway. They're happy in every country that is not Muslim. And who do they blame? Not Islam. Not their leadership. Not themselves.

THEY BLAME THE COUNTRIES THEY ARE HAPPY IN!

So, no matter what, anything and everything becomes a cause for Muslim violence against non-Muslims. Because Islam itself is the problem.

What should we do?

1. First and Foremost: Speak, Think and Discuss openly about Islam. No kid-glove treatment in the name of minorities.

2. Discredit and Expose Islam for what it is.

3. Ban Islam, its teaching, and its practice.

IFIH's Working Paper on Indian Nationalism

The International Forum For India's Heritage (IFIH) has a nice working paper on inspiring the young in India and instilling nationalistic values in them. We present some of their noteworthy recommendations below:

(a). The lives of the great early exponents of Indian nationalism, for instance Swami Vivekananda, Bal Gangadhar Tilak, Sri Aurobindo, Sister Nivedita, Subramania Bharati and others, must be taught in an inspiring manner. Also a collection of brief extracts from inspirational writings by a wide selection of Indian Nationalists and freedom fighters, from all regions of India, should be made available to students as supplementary reading material.


(b). A certain number of misconceptions still plague the way in which the freedom movement is taught; for instance, the notion that the Indian nation came into existence only thanks to the colonial masters; the failure to highlight the distinctive features of Indian nationalism as compared to Western types of nationalism; the eclipse of a number of important early pioneers of the freedom movement, their values, thoughts, action and role; the depiction of some freedom fighters as “terrorists”; party considerations in highlighting one group of leaders resulting in sacrificing the importance of the contributions of other leaders. A fair and objective account of the freedom movement, devoid of any ideological bias, is yet to be written.


(c). Keeping in mind the cultural roots of Indian nationalism, which are far more ancient than the colonial era, Sanskrit should be taught at primary, middle and secondary levels. In particular, the two great Indian Epics, which have long played a considerable role in culturally unifying the nation, must be studied, preferably through innovative methods such as those outlined above. Here again, reference may be made to the recent Supreme Court judgement, which explicitly “emphasized the importance of Sanskrit study and declared the omission of Sanskrit from CBSE syllabus as unjustified.”


(d). The above recommendations are, in fact, part of a process of decolonization of the Indian mind, an indispensable process if students are to become truly Indian, conscious of what India has stood for throughout history and can still offer to humanity today and tomorrow.


Emphasizing teachings and lives of nationalist thinkers, sanskrit, the truth regarding the freedom movement, and decolonizing the Indian mind are really very important and the effort of IFIH must be commended.


Here, we want to mention a few points which get lost in the confusion created by the constraint of political correctness owing to our secular socialist system.


Some of these are:


1. While decolonizing Indian mind, we must also emphatically de-Islamize (de-moghulize) India.


2. Thus, in language, we must de-urduize, de-arabicize and de-persianize Hindi used by the population. Instead the Sanskrit roots of Hindi must be strengthened. Modern day Hindi news channels, movies are imposing Arabic and Persian on Indian people while calling it Hindi.


3. Similarly, we must also de-moghulize the names of our cities. Cities like Aurangabad, must be renamed. Recall that Aurangzeb was a tyrannical Muslim ruler and who terrorized Hindus, and we must surely not be celebrating his name! Names like Ahmedabad, Allahabad, and so on must GO!

...


And there are many more to be added. We welcome readers' suggestions.

Save the Army from Civilians

A few years ago a boy was killed for trespassing into a Defense Compound in Bangalore (see here). In a recent incident, another boy has been killed in Chennai (see here).

There was a lot of hue and cry over the incident in Bangalore, and now there is a similar lot in Chennai. All and sundry are crying foul while asserting that the boys were innocent. Jayalalitha has gone onto accuse the army for the killing. Similar emotional accusations were made even after the Bangalore incident.

There are many points in these stories and we must avoid conflating issues. First let us merely observe the facts. Two boys (on separate occasions) sneaked into defense areas, and were killed. Let us also grant that untimely deaths have been tragic. But then who is to be blamed?

It has been well known that defense establishments work with their own rules and frameworks. These rules and frameworks may seem unsavory, but they are the result of wisdom coming from long experience, in many cases, of centuries. After all, armies have existed for much much longer than civilian governments have existed.

It is also true and understandable that civilians live by civilian rules and they might be at variance, especially in terms of strictness, with those of the army. By and large, defense establishments work under the management code 'You can't ask the question why. It is for you to do or die'. A high premium on discipline and obedience. This seemingly brutal rule is necessary since often at critical situations time is very short and a lightening response is needed. Not merely the army, but even the police and the fire-fighters operate on similar principles. As can easily be understood, the need for quick reaction is paramount in these institutions.

On the other hand, civilians may want the culture of debate or negotiation rather than obedience. Often times the paucity of time, excepting in emergency situations, is never an issue. And a comprehensive and careful analysis including multiple re-examinations, cross-examinations, debates even across the hierarchy are not merely acceptable, they are even encouraged, as they must be.

Neither is wrong, both are right, then where is the mistake? The error lies in mixing of these two. And why do we mix the two? Because we are dumb-fucks. Since ages ago, serious and sincere administrators have known that it is unwise to keep defense and civilian populations in overlapping or close locations. The demarcation between the city and the cantonment has been understood for ages and ages. Often they were even separated by large gaps acting as buffer zones.

However, India's urban planners and politicians have allowed the civilian settlements to mushroom almost as an undergrowth of defense colonies. When two completely different systems live close by, such accidents are the obvious outcomes.

However, in our urgency to gain popular civilian support, we must not blame the army or the defense establishment, nor should we demand any change in the behavior from the defense personnel. India's defense establishment has already been badly abused, and if we do not want them to degenerate into what our police has become, we would rather avoid meddling in their affairs.

Nor need we demand any change in civilian life-styles. What we must demand is that these entities must be sufficiently isolated from each other. The present hue and cry over army firing seems to focus on the emotional issues. The death of young boys is tragic, but it is not the army jawan who is responsible for such deaths. It is the politicians like Jayalalita and our dumb-fuck town planners who fail to implement an adequate and effective isolation between the two, for they are usually in collusion with the real-estate mafia.

This is not to state that army must be free to do to civilians what they like. Once a proper isolation is effected, neither party can coerce its mode on the other. But more importantly, these chest thumping fools who want to save the civilians from the army are morons. In India, it is the army which needs to be saved from civilians! And remember, we need to save the army so that the army can save us.

An Update:

An ex-army officer has allegedly confessed to shooting the boy. According to the report the officer ... told police that he shot at Dilshan after getting annoyed over the boys from a nearby locality frequenting the campus to pluck almond.

There will always be a debate whether such an explanation by the officer is acceptable or not. However this update surely reemphasizes what we said in the above post, and that is, we need to isolate cantonments from civil settlements. We need to save our army so that the army can save us.