Saturday, February 27, 2010

Where is our country going?

I was under the wrong impression that I was being outrageous while describing our MSM (Main Stream Media), The Government, The Political Leadership as Dumb Fucks (DFs). I realize that I have been, in fact, understating the facts. What else can explain the following?

Recently, when MF Hussein was conferred Qatar citizenship, the "whole nation" rose in support of the nonagenarian.

Exhibiting their DF-ness are: The Center, Artists from India, Sharmila Khan Pataudi, The Center once again, The inimitable N. Ram, and none other than Mr. Mohan Bhagwat, the chief of RSS!

All these asses cite "Freedom of Expression" as their argument. Well, OK, MFH needs to be allowed to publish nude pics of Hindu deities due to this clause.

Now, watch the contrast. Another "artist", by name Macha Laxmaiah alias Krantikar, also a civil rights activist, wants to warn his fellow countrymen, nay, fellow human beings in the world, of a stinker of an ideology in his book titled "Crescent over the world - is a boon or the silent Holocaust?". It results in a protest, claiming that it contained quotes from "banned" books "The Satanic Verses", and "Lajja" by authors Mr. Salman Rushdie, and Ms Taslima Nasreen. The result(?) is the "arrest" of the author and his two "helpers". I wonder, if "The Hindu" even reported this. What are MFH's "protectors", The Center, Sharmila, Artists, N. Ram, Mohan Bhagwat and so on doing?

Are Salman Rushdie, and Ms Taslima Nasreen any less artistic than MFH? Why should MFH have the "freedom of expression" but not SR or TN, or anyone else including Mr. Macha Laxmaiah?

Mark my words, I am not being outrageous when I call this whole group starting from The Center to Mr Mohan Bhagwat, a bunch of DFs. I am understating the facts.

And, I am not being outrageous even when I say that: I wish this ninety year old stinking shit-pack of a painter goes to say hello to another departed shit-pack, pain in the backside, Mr. Jyotirmoy Basu.

Where is our country going? O my people, come and save this country.

Budget 2010: Is Pranav a Mukherji or a Murkhaji (Foolish)

It doesn't require a genius to observe that Mr. Finance Minister is a DF(Dumb-Fuck). Well, at least as far as the individual income tax is concerned. Our bright man from Bengal has bettered another DF from his state, the Railway Minister Ms Mamata Banerji. One wonders if the members of this government are ministers or sinister(s).

While Mamata presented the Rail Budget of West Bengal, not of the Indian Union, Pranav presented the budgetary insight of a damn fool. Coming to brass tacks, leaving the zero tax limit for an individual to the previous limit of Rs. 1.6 lac is moronic. Mr FM possibly wants to better sadistic performance of his bong senior Monsieur Jyotirmoy Basu, who fortunately logged off after tormenting his motherland for about nine decades.

An "ideal balanced family" of six - grandfather, grandmother, husband, wife, and two children (a son and a daughter) - requires, at the very least, about Rs. 30,000 every month for a decent living. This makes it, Rs. 3.6 lac per annum. A small allowance, for occasional luxury should make it about Rs. 4 lac an annum. Now, circa 2010, this should be the zero tax limit. And if, as usual, other sinister members of Mr. PM's cabinet conspire to perpetrate the present inflationary trends, by circa 2011 this limit has to be pushed to Rs. 5 lac per annum.

Now, instead of this, the DF moron has "relaxed" the tax-regime, by upping the other slab limits, making some of the tax slabs wider.

We must understand a few things very clearly. The taxes are way too high, even now anyway; so widening of the slabs, albeit necessary and hence welcome, is not enough. Meaning therefore, that this government is merely reducing its sins, and is still far from being virtuous by even sufficiently low standards. And finally, the absence of any relaxation in the zero tax limit, even this penitence effect is grossly undermined.

This clearly shows that this government intends to bloody rob the "hardest working" Aam Aadami population and subsidize and sponsor the luxurious life styles of its over-sized "twittering" ministries along with the cartel of goons who will be the "real" recipients of all the affirmative action programs which this government proposes to undertake using the tax-collections.

Mr PM, FM and the accompanying DF's, where is your promise to be the government of the "Aam Aadami"?

Tuesday, February 23, 2010

Idiocy of the Election Commission

In a news item, the EC of India has said that "Burqa is not integral to Islam". This has come up with regards to the issuing of voter-identity cards to Muslim women. A simple question is, "Does it matter?". For, the more important question is, what would EC do if it indeed is integral to Islam?

Our policy makers, starting from the DF Jawahar, have always been sidestepping on crucial issues. What EC must have said is that, "A photograph of the full face is a MUST" period. Islam or No Islam ain't matter. Instead they have made bleating noises regarding burqa not being integral to Islam. What happens if the Darul Uloom Deoband or Bareilley issues a fatwa stating that "burqa is integral to Islam"? EC will tie itself into knots!!

Nitin Gadakari's DF-ness

Nitin Gadakari, the new chief of the BJP, has appealed to the muslims to support the making of Ram temple in Ayodhya. Worst of all, he says that he is NOT opposed to the construction of a mosque beside the temple. As if there are not already more than enough numbers of mosques in this country. Isn't NG `such a lovely' DF?

I wonder what makes our leaders lick the toes of these muslims? Are muslim toes very tasty? And remember that NG has been hoisted by the RSS! I pity the intelligence of Shri Mohan Bhagwat.

If our so called "hard-liners" are such wishy-washy blobs of cotton, imagine what our "peace-loving, tolerant, secular" Hindu Indians will be?

I surmise that If NG is made the Prime-Minister of this country, he will appeal to Pakistan (as our DF PM's have been doing over the years) to make India a terror-attack free nation. And this DF will do it with an ardent hope!

SIkhs Beheaded by Muslims

The newspaper "The Hindu" reported that two sikhs were beheaded by Pakistani Taliban. The whole report, from the above link, is copied below:


Two Sikhs beheaded

Peshawar/Islamabad: Two Sikhs who were kidnapped over a month back have been beheaded by the Pakistani Taliban in the country’s restive tribal belt in a brutal act by the militants.

Some more members of the minority community are still in the custody of the rebels.


"What's news in this?" you may ask. Watch carefully, the report calls the killers "militants". Had these killers been Pramod Mutalik's men or Shiv Sainiks, they would have been termed "Hindu Fundamentalists".

So every time you read/watch news, observe how the media is conning your subconscious against "Hinduism", while softening you towards "Islam" and other such faiths.

This also should be a message to the Sikh community (truly speaking all non-muslims), that Islam or muslims can never be, and will never be friends or well-wishers of non-muslims.

Thursday, February 11, 2010

DF-ery Continued

When two big fools fight, it is difficult to imagine who'll be worse off than the other. Messrs. Bal Thakerey, and Raj Thakerey are displaying just that. In his recent remarks Mr. Raj tacitly supports SRK. Raj should oppose Big B, if he is upset with him, and oppose SRK too.

SRK is busy displaying his "integrity" here. SRK has proved himself to be a sinister guy when he proclaimed post 26/11 Mumbai attacks that Islam was being portrayed in bad light and that he would work towards salvaging its image. Can you imagine? "Islam being portrayed in bad light"? Phew. What has Islam been doing for past 1400 years? Running charity shows?

For the unsuspecting and gullible readers, let me inform you that the real story on which "Chak De India" was based had a Hindu coach. The movie had the name altered to a muslim name at the insistence of SRK. The buzz doing the rounds is that SRK insists on having a muslim name for himself in his movies. Even if it is statistically true, it shows the man that he is, rather the Shylock that he is.

Avoid buying such bull**its.