Monday, December 27, 2010

Mani Shankar Aiyer exhibits his Congress-mettle by blabbering on Hindutva and showing that he is a bigger ass than we ever thought he was

In a recent television interview, the moron masquerading as philosopher, Mr. Mani Shankar Aiyer told his interviewer that Hindutva was the real and present danger to India. My initial instinct was to clap, clap and clap, except that I wished I clapped with one of my hands on his cheek. If Mr. Aiyer does not deserve a slap on his face then I wonder who ever can.

This hollow-between-the-ears Congress-intellectual was sharing his deep anguish about the BJP wind-bag (Vajpeyee) and another compulsive blabberer (Advani) and said that even though he regarded both these politicians in high esteem, yet he wanted to convey to them his pain regarding the grave dangers of the ideology of Hindutva which both these leaders have nurtured and nourished.

Firstly, as I have repeatedly pointed out that BJP-RSS are perennially confused about Hindus, so their brand of Hindutva is so confused and diffused that it is useless at best, and is more dangerous to Hindus and not to non-Hindus at worst, which usually is the case.

Secondly, even if there was a Hindutva which, like the moron-masquerading-as-philosopher would have us believe, is potentially aggressive, then what makes this suicidal nihilist think that it would be dangerous for the country? The only explanation is that Mr Aiyer thinks that only non-Hindus comprise the country! Otherwise, considering aggressive Hindutva, which should, even if it exists and which we all must wish that it exists, only be called defensive Hindutva, as dangerous to the nation is much much worse than insane! Simply, because this putative Hindutva seeks to slow down and eventually stop, all the exploitation of the Hindus which Congress and its illegitimate descendants have been indulging in for ages!

And since imbeciles like Mr Aiyer are the cerebral-centers of Congress, it is no wonder that the preceptor of the prince-frog Rahul Gandhi, viz., Digvijay Singh disgorges equally stenching speech.

However, contrary to what these fools want us to subscribe to, it is only rightly understood Hindutva (Sanatana Dharma) which will save the nation and us; and not the stupid ideologies of Mohandasian-Non-violence, and Jawaharian-Socialism taught to us by these intellectually negligible morons of the Congress.

It is high time that Hindus slapped the Congress (and its illegitimate descendants) and corrected the historical blunders.

Tuesday, December 21, 2010

Manmohan Singh and Rajdeep Sardesai : Two bums of the same crack.

Turbaned Dumb-Fuck Manmohan Singh thinks he is as much above suspicion as Caesar's wife, while the evil Rajdeep Sardesai surmises that it is the sciety whose corruption is the culprit. Both these have been analyzed here and here. Not that there is nothing wrong with the society in India. However, Rajdeep is the last person who deserves to point this out. And Manmohan is Brutus imposting as Caesar's wife.

Now, one always wonders whether Rajdeep is merely evil or besides being evil he is a Dumb-Fuck too. And similarly whether TDF(Turbaned Dumb-Fuck) PM Manmohan is merely a DF or evil as well.

Recently I was speaking to an academician who had been a great fan of Manmohan for the latter's academic credentials. It was ironic to notice the change in perception of the former. After skimming over the details of Nuclear-Deal (Both the Nuclear Bill and the Liability-Bill), the abysmal performance post 26/11 in relation to national security, the academician thought that the charitable explanation for Manmohan's actions could be that he wants to ensure 8% GDP growth even at the coast of a 26/11 every two years so that India becomes an entity to reckon with in the global community so that perhaps then India will be able to call its shots. Now this is a typical example of prejudice over evidence.

Notwithstanding how meek this turbaned clown looks, his actions (decisions) in the past have epitomised callous dumb-fuckery at best, and devious traitorousness at worst. Unless the script-writer of the events to unfold be a David Dhawan producing a 'hit" for Govinda which will establish Manmohan as PM-Number-1, all the odds based on evidence are to the contrary.

A skeptic might ask: 'Where's the hard evidence?'. Well, what others are doing is the evidence! In view of all that the UPA governments both 1 and 2 have done, if Manmohan was what he pretends to be or what gullible people take him to be, then he would either have resigned (finding himself too weak to make UPA government move in the right direction) or engineered a change (in the right direction). It is clear as broad day-light that he has done neither. Rather he is allowing his suave image to be used by Congress as a veil behind which they can hide and implement their devious and evil plans. Nuclear Bill, Liability Bill, 2-G scam, POTA repealment, handling J&K, are only a few amongst the many subversive and corrupt actions.

A person who thinks nice of Manmohan, must be exceedingly simple minded if not a blatant conspirer.

As for Rajdeep, I think he can still be a better cricketer than he is a media-person! And the comment is about his media-ability and not his cricketing-abilities which hardly anyone knows. This man is trying to be in media what Manmohan has successfully been in politics. A nice man. Phew.

An unfortunate thing about India is that there are no leaders! Only self-fulfilling bureaucrats who seek to further their own selves in the public-sector hierarchy! You name any so called leader whether in politics or in media or anywhere, and what you will get are either corrupt scoundrels who look like themselves or corrupt scoundrels who look like school boys who have been chosen monitors of their classes.

And yet as always, I repeat: O the only hope, O these crores of lovely gullible Indians, rise to rewrite your destiny.

Congress setting New standards of Evil Dirtiness (As always!)

As if the fecal output from Digvijay Singh and Rahul Gandhi was not enough, now the Thayee of Congress has joined the orgy! And we might as well call her Mother of all this Sh*t.

Now Congress in concert is blaming Hindu-terror, Saffron-terror for various things. As I said in the past: "Even a marginally sane person should wish that the false fears expressed by this Singh turn out to be true and those hitherto nonexistent beings somehow come to life and inflict on him in the worst possible manner that which this poisonous liar claims would have been inflicted upon the late chief of ATS.", I say it again: Hindus should not take this as an accusation, they must rather view it a clarion call, accept the challenge, and decimate the Congress, not merely politically but literally as well. I am sure that at the grass-roots level, there are gullible members who have been taken by these leaders for a ride. If they have any blood in their veins, they must revolt! The hope if not in these leaders. Any ray of hope is only in the grass-roots workers from across parties uniting for the cause of Sanatana Dharma.

As for the claim of the Congress : "Terrorism has No Religion", the less said the better. It is the Congress which considers Hindus as terrorists and Muslims as devout followers of Religion-of-Peace. For those who emote with Congress, it may be worthwhile to open their eyes and look at the truth of the-one-true-religion-of-peace!

And mind you, the thayee in the SP-BJP is mum on these rhetorical outbursts of the thayee of the Congress!

Sunday, December 19, 2010

Rahul's clarification: Too little, Too late

The emperor's new clothes are a laughing stock. A prince's new clothes must be a ridiculing stock!

The main point is not that Rahul has clarified. The main point is why he made those remarks! And what is his state of mind, if not exposed by wiki-leaks. Wiki-Leaks have revealed the dark secrets in the minds of Congress-Persons and now they are attempting to camouflage it by "clarifications".

If Varun Gandhi was called a communal for making aggressive statements for defending hindus, he was attacked by the Congress and its stooges. And now when Rahul makes blatantly anti-hindu statements and that too not in a political speech, but rather in a secret conversation, he is being defended by Congress-stooges.

This is why I have said time and again, that Congress is so blatantly anti-hindu party that it has to be destroyed, if India has to survive. The great scourge Mohandas, if only he ever made an intelligent suggestion, it was, Congress must be disbanded. But since that bandit of a politician, the crafty and sly Jawahar was there too, he managed to deflect that suggestion.

So Congress has survived to further its anti-hindu agenda, just exactly as Islam is there to be anti-non-Muslims. So congress is a natural ally of all anti-hindu forces, and it provides a fulcrum for all of them to collude and conspire.

Those who have intelligently rejected Mohandas must destroy Congress, and those who follow that walking-poison-for-hindus Mohandas, must follow his advice and disband Congress. So in any case, Congress has to be destroyed.

Rahul and Digvijay Singh are only two poisonous flies in the comb of poisonous wasps that masquerades as a political party in the name of Congress. Just exactly as Islam and Christianity are political ideologies masquerading as religions.

We (Sanatana Dharmis) must quickly recognize their farce, and cleanse our system of them.

And mind you, beware of falling into the traps of truly secular parties like the SP-BJP!

Tuesday, December 14, 2010

Digvijay Singh is so full of SH*T that his eyes look brown ...

Even before I asked in one of my earlier post that the allegations by this blighter Digvijay Singh must be investigated I had almost sniffed this coming from him.

Now this bag of shit has opened his foul mouth again to deliver a few more stinkers. He now claims that BSNL does not have the records since the incident took place more than twelve months ago. I surmise that he made his revelations deliberately more than twelve months later so as to avoid possible verification. This is typical strategy of Congress-persons. This pot of shit , in the same news item, also claims that he is not a liar!

Another item accuses Mr. Singh of politicising India's darkest hour. I think that is a very charitable charge. What this petilential blob of turd is up to is much worse. As a blogger has commented: DS is Pakistan's ISI's dream come true. I think the blogger still has been very mild in his opinions. Mr. Singh must be in the pay-rolls of ISI, if not directly, then indirectly through the arses he licks, namely those of Sonia and Rahul. Please note that neither of these two have chastised Mr Singh. This Singh is trying to worst the elder Singh who got the affirmative action policy implemented for higher education and even at places meant for technical excellence!

Even a marginally sane person should wish that the false fears expressed by this Singh turn out to be true and those hitherto nonexistent beings somehow come to life and inflict on him in the worst possible manner that which this poisonous liar claims would have been inflicted upon the late chief of ATS.

Saturday, December 11, 2010

Karkare and Congress General Secretary Mr. Digvijay Singh

In a recent news item, it is reported that Congress General Secretary Mr Digvijay Singh claimed that he was contacted by the then ATS chief Hemant Karkare who was later killed in the terror encounter. Mrs. Kavita, wife of the slain ATS chief, rubbished the suggestions.

It appears, or could be plausible, that Mr. Singh must have master-minded the death of Mr Karkare and now is looking for an alibi by claiming that he was called by Mr Karkare. Even if the conversation records are present with the cell-phone service provider, in view of the Congress Party and the Scam-Raja, there is no guarantee that the records have not been tampered with to suit the advantages of Congressmen.

However, this suggestion of a conversation between Mr Karkare and Mr Singh must be assiduously probed and if ambiguities are found, Mr Singh must be sent to confer with Mr Karkare to seek his pardon. Of course, Mr Karkare would give Mr Singh an appropriate treatment.

Mr. Digvijay Singh would do well if he confined himself to his duty as a Congressman to lick the backside of UPA chairperson, rather than pretending to be a smart detective, which even his angels can not become.

My heart bleeds for Mrs Kavita, who has to undergo all this ruckus being orchestrated by these imbecile clowns. If one has to be objective, it is a foregone conclusion that Mr Karkare and his team acted rather amateurishly while chasing the terrorists. The allegations that the bullet-proof jackets weren't bullet-proof is also worrisome. Those who approved the purchase must be tried for treason as well as murder, and should be sent to Al-Qaid as emissaries to promote freedom of religions!

My sincere advice for Mrs. Karkare is the following:

If she wants to be left alone in peace, it might be prudent to migrate to some western country.

If she wants to transform the Indian system, she has to make herself really strong and fight to finish against the corrupt and dumb-fuck system that Indians have made for themselves. A word of caution, she must assiduously guard against following the foot-steps of Medha Patkar, Arundhati roy, and Shobha De; unless she wants to make a life for herself in a traitorous way.

The irony in the Indian system is that while courageous women like Mrs Kavita are short-changed, foreign women like Ms Sonia are worshiped! But it is high time that common people like Mrs Kavita take up cudgels and fight the system. It is a torrid time for her. Barely has she lost her husband and she is being dragged into all this non-sense. Recall the sympathy which Sonia got after Rajiv was killed, while Kavita gets only apathy!

But Mrs Kavita, I humbly urge you to have courage and faith. It is the descendants of honest persons like you who will inherit India, and not these illegitimate off-springs, along with their backslide slurping coterie, of the Jawahar-Mohandas clan. And that's the earnest prayer to Ishwara from the heart of all right-minded Hindus.

Friday, December 10, 2010

Pat Down Security Check of Meera Shankar : The Issues

Recently there has been a Hulla-Balloo about pat-down security check on India's envoy to the US Ms Meera Shankar. The media seems to express righteous indignation and they recall SRKhan's supposed ordeal at a US airport last year which lead to his Broke-Back mountain partner Karan Johar making a movie MNIK (My Name is Khan) amongst other things.

As Indians we have to understand an important distinction between a law-abiding society and a law-less society! We as Indians are inching towards lawlessness. Why? One may ask. Let me give you something to chew on.

A typical western person takes pride in the fact that even the highest ranking person in his country is subject to the same set of laws that govern the common people. While in India, even the smallest politician prides himself in the claim that how law does not apply on him!

Now, you need not even go to the level of politicians. you take any Samiti, Group or whatever: The rules applies to "ordinary members"; while "office bearers" are above the rules! You go to a government or private hospital, or anywhere!

Thus in India, while law-makers discuss a new law, they are completely oblivious to its implications, and they can afford that, for the law will never apply on them! In few and far between cases if the law indeed applies on them, you can see the dismay and righteous indignation on their faces! These days, even petty media persons (like Barkha Dutt) consider themselves to be above the law! Huh.

In more enlightened nations, this is not so. Rules are made to be implemented!

So it comes down to whether as a society we have respect for the rule of law. We must admit that as Indians, we don't have that, well most of the times. Thus there is a rush for seeking immunity from law!

Post 9/11 and other such attempts, the US (and the west) is rightly concerned about their security. Why do they have to be like India, which is sitting like a lame duck even after 26/11 where its own home minister was giving a running commentary on the deployment of forces for the benefit of the terrorists!

So, they have implemented the body scan or its alternative pat-down check. And they might as well do it for their own people. And they are doing it on all!

So why should Meera Shankar have any quibbles on that? Why should SRKhan not be subject to the security check that every other person is subject to? Who should be and why should anybody be above the rule of law?

As long as the Dumb-fuck Indians, do not develop self-respect, and thereby develop respect for the rule of law, thereby respect the process of law-making, so long as we are not serious about that; we have a problem on our hands.

I just now heard on the news that the Security Authority of the airports in US has refused to regret the pat-down check, and I commend them. The diplomats of India are not above the law, even more so, the law of a foreign land.

Indians may have the habit of cringing before the VIP's, not everyone else! Not only Meera Shankar, Sonia too should undergo pat-down security check somewhere, so that they might develop some semblance of respect for the law for ordinary citizens. Those who are used to traveling in cars with red-lights in India have heads far above their shoulders. It is high time that they let it rest where it must, on the shoulders and the feet on the ground.

Oh, and I miss being the one giving pat-down checks to some of these beauties. But I guess they employ only women security employees for patting women passengers. Should we fight against this gender discrimination too? Hahaha.

Modi has two enemies: LeT and Thayee (Sushma Swaraj)

MS informs us that LeT was plotting to kill Gujarat CM Narendra Modi. I am sure they would have had a friend in BJP! Thayee (Ms Swaraj) was attempting to kill Mr Modi politically during the recent Bihar polls. Of course, if LeT had succeeded, Thayee would have used Modi's picture to win an election for herself!

This is the level to which we have reduced ourselves!

BJP calls this American inaction! Did they raise the issue as to why visa was denied to Modi when President Obama visited? No. The "leaders" in the BJP (read LKA, Jaswant Sigh, Arun Jaitley, and Sushma Swaraj) do not consider anyone other than themselves (and do not want anyone else other than themselves) National Leaders! So how does it matter if Modi was denied a visa? what is more important is that SR Khan was groped as security measure! So you see the conclusion! BJP sees all Muslims as peaceful, but Modi as mass-murderer!

So beware, it is not merely LeT which is trying to assassinate Modi. And the numbers who are trying to kill Hinduism (sanatana dharma) is much larger!

Why should V Bhatt's resignation from Vijay Karnataka matter?

Vishweshwar Bhatt has resigned from the editor's post of Vijay Karnataka. And there are rumors doing the rounds!

Why should we be concerned? If Mr Bhatt has been wronged, he must come out in the open! I am also surprised that Media Syndicate considers this to be a possible conspiracy! First of all, I do not see any thing in what Mr Bhatt did that should attract a conspiratorial removal! The owners are TOI (Times of India Group), if they want to remove Mr Bhatt, they remove it, that's it! Or, if Mr Bhatt wants to leave, he just leaves! Why should we sniff conspiracy?

But there is a greater conspiracy at work against India where we do not sniff! We have got so used to it that we feel that it is perfectly normal to be in such a situation:

1. We have a Super PM (Prime Minister) who is a a foreigner, and a Christian.

2. We have a Primer Minister who is a Sikh (sick too?), and who recently goofed in Kashmir by letting separatists a bigger say!

3. We celebrate Arundhati Roy, a Christian who is anti-Indian, as a great speaker for human rights!

4. We have a President, Mrs. Patil, who recalled her statement that "veils came to India as a result of Muslim invasion", emphasizing that even our President has NO Freedom of Speech, while Arundhati Roy, and Muslim separatists enjoy all the freedoms!

5. Our major media groups are headed by non-Hindus (read anti-hindus). For example, TOI by Jains, and The Hindu by N. Ram!

The list is almost endless! Here lies a much bigger conspiracy!

Thursday, December 9, 2010

Democracy and Corruption in India

KMS of Media Syndicate has posted an interesting article on corruption in India. He has raised some very important questions. And in his inimitable style left the answers open! A thought provoking piece indeed.

Before we delve into the nitty-gritty, we need to understand a few fundamental differences.

1. Republic and Democracy are not the same: A Republic is representative government ruled by law (the Constitution). A democracy is direct government ruled by the majority (mob rule). A Republic recognizes the inalienable rights of individuals while democracies are only concerned with group wants or needs (the public good).

1.a. India, although enshrined as "Republic" in the constitution, has effectively been functioning as "Democracy". Recall how the constitution is amended for trifling reasons. Indira Gandhi did it (changing India to Secular-Socialist... in 1972), Rajiv Gandhi did it (Muslim women protection-post Shah Bano case), they DO it all the time.

1.b. Vote bank politics is typical of extractive view of politics. Since the powers of the government are not restricted constitutionally, the "elected" representatives are free to do as they please. Thus those who vote them to power "extract" favors, and the elected grant them favors.

2. Universal Enfranchisement and Restricted enfranchisement are not the same: In most countries all persons above a particular age have the right to vote. In India it is 18 years of age. This is universal enfranchisement. I personally differ from this. I think that only those who have a stake in the survival of the nation and who are responsible ought to vote. For vote is power, and without the wisdom to exercise power, power is perilous, not just for oneself but for the rest as well.

2.a. It is common knowledge in India that the vote of many of the people can be bought with just a bottle of liquor and a blanket. Should such individuals have the right to vote? Government introduces some pension-benefit, or some women-benefit, in short some affirmative action, and the beneficiaries vote for the benefactor. Should such things happen?

2.b It is also common knowledge that in border areas, politicians grant ration cards and then voting rights to illegal immigrants, for example in Bengal. Should such things happen?

3. Electoral Process: Tamasha and Debate are not the same: In India, there are no debates between the contestants, there is only shadow boxing! At some rally Advani-babu will hurl a charge and at another rally sonial-madam will respond rhetorically. Allegations are answered by counter-allegations and not refutations.

3.a UPA will call NDA communal, and NDA will call UPA pseudo-secular; while both surrender to bullies, and resort to minority appeasement.

3.b People contest elections from jail even though they have been booked and jailed under criminal charges!

4. Parliamentary system and Presidential system are not the same: In presidential form, the president can be held responsible and accountable for whatever happens. In parliamentary system, the accountability is diffused, so despite having ministers like Raja and so on, Manmohan can survive, so can Sonia!

5. Incompatibility of democratic process and the high-command structure has already been highlighted by KMS in his article.

So all in all, we have a farcical system! Dumb-fucks claiming to be politicians and getting elected, and dumb-fucks electing them time and again! This has to end! So what's the solution? Please note that I do not have all the answers, much less all the correct answers; however we need to ponder over these questions. We need to propose tentative solutions, discuss and debate them, and then most importantly choose to implement them.

My take on the matter:

1. We need a new constitution.

2. We need a presidential form of government.

3. We need to be republic. And we need to restrict the powers of the elected representatives.

4. We need to restrict franchise.

5. We need have debates rather than mere political speeches!

And many more to be added ...

And most importantly, we need to draw inspiration and wisdom from our ancient civilization and other civilizations as well. Learn from their pluses as well as minuses! For the uninitiated this introduction of the term civilization will strike a jarring note, but bear with me. There is a lot to be gained by understanding human nature with both its virtues and follies, and what better way to learn than to use available knowledge in addition to what we know and have discovered?

Sunday, November 21, 2010

Karnataka CM Yeddyurappa rules out resigning ... Does he rule out CRYING too?

In his most recent show of manliness, Karnataka Chief-Minister Mr. Yeddyurappa has ruled out resigning. He says: “Why should I (resign)? There is no offence from my side. I have not committed any mistake,”. This is what he supposedly told reporters in Bangalore before leaving for New Delhi. Now I have a question for Mr. Yeddy: why did you cry if you never did anything wrong? Why are you running to "High-Command" in Delhi? What can you prove by going to Delhi?

So this is what our country is: An elected self-proclaimed "upright CM" runs like a pussy to New Delhi to prove his innocence. And this is in a party, which proclaims itself to be a party with a difference. So folks, do you understand what the difference is? Is the difference that in Congress it is high-command = Sonia, and in BJP it is high-command = Sushma? No matter that it is old-wise-man LKAdvani and young-wise-man NitinGadkari holding a one-on-one talk in Delhi to decide Yeddy's fate.

How can there be a healthy and vibrant democracy in the presence of a high-command culture? Is Congress democratic? NO. Is JD(S) democratic? NO. Each party is a Congress with different Nehru-Gandhi equivalents at the helm. The high-command is taken to be wise. So Sonia-Rahul in Congress, Devegowda-Kumaraswamy in JD(S) are the decision makers. Why, because it is they who have most of the money, and all parties need money.

So today BSY will claim that he has not done any wrong, and yet he may resign tomorrow at the behest of his high-command. It does not depend upon whether BSY is right or not. That is an insignificant point. What is important is who wields more power, AnanthKumar or BSY, Sushma or BSY. And even if there is truce, it is only a temporary lull before another impending storm. Moreover, remember that the moment Yeddy's fate hangs in balance, the fate of his loyal ministers also hangs in balance! No points for guessing who BSY considers as his loyal ministers.

Governments may go or not go, Chief-ministers may go or not go; but the EGOs of these stupid politicians will never go.

Friday, November 19, 2010

Besides Hooliganism and Goonda-Raj, Congress also supports Scam-Raj, and Scam-Raja!

How many of us understand the meaning of One Lakh Seventy Thousand Crore Rupees? Well, that is the alleged size of the scam in 2-G disbursement. Raja may have been asked to resign, but there are a few important questions:

1. Was Raja so skilled that he could pull it off without even a whiff of a hint to any other member of the government (ministers-bureaucrats)? If yes, then they are all damn fools who must at once be thrown out! If no, then all those who had the knowledge must also be charged appropriately.

2. What is the stand of the Kalaigner M Karunanidhi? Does he prefer to look with begoggled-eyes in the dark at the follies of his coterie?

3. What is the stand of UPA Chairperson Sonia? Is she aloof and distant? Why is she not throwing DMK out of the UPA, if DMK is not throwing out Scam-Raja? Of course, the oft-repeated answer is a platitude, that there are only charges, no indictment as yet; but the real answer is that all of these people must have received their percentages.

4. What is the stand of SP on this? After chastising their own ex-chief for his mere exercise of his freedom of speech, are the brainless lot of SP exercising their freedom of silence?

There are more questions than there are even hints of answers.

Hypocrisy of Jawahar and Congress Exposed once again, for the N'th time!

In a recent news paper item it was reported that Jawahar had pleaded to president Kennedy of America to help India during the 1962 Indo-China conflict. This is no surprise to those who know and respect facts and who have even a miniscule understanding of strategy and defense, or just a little bit of common sense.

Again, Congress leaders lack both, for they are blinded by their back-side-licking culture, which makes them grovelingly servile to the members of Jawahar-Mohandas family, however incompetent they may be.

So, these stupid Congress leaders are terming this act of Jawahar as his pragmatism. To the meanest intelligence, however, it is obvious that Jawahar's vision, policies were all utter failures. The wise men from congress are accusing America of betraying India, while it was stupidity and fool-hardiness of Jawahar that betrayed India.

O, Hindus (Hindu-WOL), please open your political eyes and act.

Tuesday, November 16, 2010

Elst responds to Secular-Stooge

Just when I was admiring the courage of M V Kamath in my previous post, a reader sent me Koenraad Elst's reply (A must read) to the JNU-type-Self-proclaimed historian Guha. Guha is currently epitomizing the Hindu-haters dissected by Mr Kamath.

Guha's claim to fame is his backside licking skills which he practices on those he considers "Bold and the Beautiful". Guha's B&B list includes the likes of members of Nehru-Gandhi family, cricketers in India, and the likes. He appears on talk shows as an intellectual (phew) and farts by sublimating the garbage that fills his otherwise empty shoulder-top (his head). Those who might want to have a glimpse of his, please check wikipedia entry on him. He is also described by his leftist admirers as Arun Shourie of the left. The left specializes in the art of mutual backside licking. One could even term it as the Left-69 position!

The summary of the exchange is as follows:

Guha in an article titled "Foreign Certificates" in The Hindu, pooh-poohed Mr Elst's credentials as a historian to which Mr. Elst sent a fitting reply, which was never published by the news paper. So Mr. Elst has replied in a post.

What an irony, Hindu-haters having first names like "Ramchandra", and Hindu-hating publications having names like "The Hindu"? They all are, Mohandasian in their advice to Hindus. For example, while they always recommend appeasement of the anti-Hindus, they advise strictures against ever-erring-Hindus! They will blame RSS, obviously wrongly, for Mohandas assassination but, again wrongly, absolve Congress and its hooligans of violence against Sikhs in 1984!

The self-appointed Guha surely belongs to the list of those who must be discredited for spreading lies.

MVKamath chastises the pseudo-secularists and then gives in to their "world-view"

In a recent article which has been syndicated here, columnist M V Kamath made very important observations about the sickness of pseudo-secularists. For example:

1. Hiding the bloody and barbaric persecution of Hindus by Islamic and Christian invaders in the past.

2. Running down Hinduism and Hindu culture.

These are important points and deserve compliments as well as attention. But then he turns around and nullifies his own understanding by the following: "We will over come ...but a Good people with an open heart, ready to forget a painful past, ready to work with all people irrespective of their religion, ..."(italics mine). It is necessary to appreciate that it is this philosophy of "Absolute Non-discrimination" which is implied in the quoted text that began the down slide of our great civilization.

We must understand that the failure was not merely political, it was a kind of spiritual-stupidity as well. It is like Mohandas making "Non-violence of the Mohandas kind" the highest principle to owe allegiance to. Hindus are non-violent only in the sense that Lord Krishna was non-violent, where he adjured Arjuna to fight the unrighteousness with military might, and not the meek surrender that Mohandas was advocating for the Jews and the Allied forces during World War II against Hitler's atrocities. For example here:

"I would like you to lay down the arms you have as being useless for saving you or humanity. You will invite Herr Hitler and Signor Mussolini to take what they want of the countries you call your possessions...If these gentlemen choose to occupy your homes, you will vacate them. If they do not give you free passage out, you will allow yourselves, man, woman, and child, to be slaughtered, but you will refuse to owe allegiance to them."


"Hitler," Gandhi said, "killed five million Jews. It is the greatest crime of our time. But the Jews should have offered themselves to the butcher’s knife. They should have thrown themselves into the sea from cliffs... It would have aroused the world and the people of Germany... As it is they succumbed anyway in their millions."

"If I were a Jew and were born in Germany and earned my livelihood there, I would claim Germany as my home even as the tallest Gentile German might, and challenge him to shoot me or cast me in the dungeon; I would refuse to be expelled or to submit to discriminating treatment. And for doing this I should not wait for the fellow Jews to join me in civil resistance, but would have confidence that in the end the rest were bound to follow my example. If one Jew or all the Jews were to accept the prescription here offered, he or they cannot be worse off than now. And suffering voluntarily undergone will bring them an inner strength and joy...the calculated violence of Hitler may even result in a general massacre of the Jews by way of his first answer to the declaration of such hostilities. But if the Jewish mind could be prepared for voluntary suffering, even the massacre I have imagined could be turned into a day of thanksgiving and joy that Jehovah had wrought deliverance of the race even at the hands of the tyrant. For to the God-fearing, death has no terror."

No wonder Mohandas'a grandson, another Mohandasian bigot, commented, what he did. David Lewis Schaefer has rightly termed Mohandas a one-sided-pacifist.

It is very important to completely discredit the hideous philosophy of people like Mohandas. Authors, even when they make good points like Mr. Kamath did, must assiduously guard against inadvertently approving subscription to Absolute Non-discrimination of the confused modern liberal media philosophers.

But for this, MVK's observations are a good beginning towards correcting our folly. If his recommendations imply complete over-haul of history-education specially in schools, which is currently infested with Jawaharian doctored history created by JNU academicians of the Romila Thapar kind, we must all be for it.

Friday, November 12, 2010

Headless RSS unable to challenge Hooliganism and Goonda Raj of the Congress:

After Sudarshan's remark against Sonia Gandhi and the subsequent fallout of congress hooliganism, it became further obvious that:

1. RSS lacks brains, rather in most probability it has none. The less we talk about the BJP the better!

2. Congress is a Goonda party just like the Communists and that they "officially" resort to hooliganism. And this is an understatement.

3. India, under Congress rule, is not governed by the Rule of Law, but rather by the unruly and uncouth Congress workers and leaders who are nothing else except brigands masquerading as politicians.

4. Despite constitutional guarantees, there is no "freedom of speech" in this country except for those who want to paint Hindu goddesses in the nude, or those who proclaim from the dais their support for secessionist forces.

The essential story thus far is as follows:

1. Congress charges RSS with the "Hindu terror tag".

2. RSS begins nationwide protest against the allegation.

3. During one such protest meeting, Sudarshan makes remarks against Mrs. Sonia Gandhi.

4. Congress incites its workers, and there is mayhem in many parts of the country.

5. RSS and BJP "distance" itself from the remarks of Sudarshan.

6. RSS and BJP "regret" and say "sorry".

Let us consider the above developments:

In response to Congress attack, besides organizing protests, SP (RSS+BJP) should have brought in libel charges against those who made the remarks. I hope they (SP) have done so, although being brain-dead as they are, I will not be surprized if they have not done so. Recall that they (SP) had failed to react appropriately against even the "Maut ke Saudagar" remark on Narendra Modi by Sonia Gandhi.

The remarks by Sudarshan are his rights to exercise "freedom of speech". Either they are his opinions, to which he is entitled, or he made allegations, which he can at best be forced to defend in a court of law.

Congress by "threatening" has actually committed an offense of "hate speech" amounting to incitement of violence, and whoever from Congress committed this must be tried for "hate speech". If congress has not disowned it as yet, then Congress has to be charged for being an accomplice (Does SP lack legal expert advice?). Further, Sonia Gandhi being the Head of congress Party must be held responsible and should be tried.

Even if RSS and BJP (SP) do not agree with Sudarshan's remarks, they must stand by him for his RIGHT to say what he feels like, and his RIGHT (and Obligation) to defend his remarks. The very fact that (SP) have quickly regretted and supposedly said sorry shows that not only do they not have a "head", that they do not even have a manly heart.

For the interested and enthusiastic reader me mention that there has been a long history of:

(a) Blunders by RSS/BJP indicating a complete absence of intellectual home work.

(b) Utter disregard for the Rule of Law, and wanton display of Hooliganism and Goondaism during Congress Regimes

(c) Inverted Freedom of Speech

and so on. However, even before we analyze the recent events, let's hazard a guess and make a prediction for Bihar:

In most likelihood, Nitish Kumar will ditch BJP no matter what the outcome in Bihar elections.

This will expose the "intelligence" of Thayee, Sushma Swaraj.

One often wonders if an appropriate description of the RSS-BJP combine could be as follows:

Disciplined set of workers in RSS devoted and dedicated to the brainless leadership of RSS. And this brainless leadership makes these set of workers available for manipulation by the utterly selfish and consummately stupid leadership of BJP.

So it becomes a case of BJP (Brainless Jokers' Party) manipulating and exploiting RSS (Really Stupid Sangh)

Let's return to the original theme and list out a few examples under various categories:

(I) Brainlessness of RSS/BJP

1. Golwalkar's praising of the Prophet in his book.

2. AB Vajpeyee praised Indira Gandhi as Durga

3. LK Advani "regretted" demolition of the structure in Ayodhya.

4. The goof by Bangaru Laxman during the sting operation conducted by Tehelka.

5. The Jinnah episode demonstrating the hypocrisy and stupidity of LK Advani, stupidity of Jaswant Singh.

6. Election debacle in 2009 showing stupidity of Arun Jaitley and Sushma Swaraj.

7. Sushma Swaraj belittling Narendra Modi to appease Nitish Kumar.

8. Sushma Swaraj meddling in Karnataka affairs. If she has any brains, she should apply where it is needed not to destabilize BJP's own government merely to settle ego-scores.

9. Unmanliness of B S Yeddyruyappa while handling the first crisis in his government in Karnataka.

10. SP (RSS/BJP) never question the principles of "Secularism", "Socialism", "father of the nation" status of Mohandas, and undeserving hallowed status of Jawahar. Rather they term themselves "Truly Secular", "Socialist", reverential towards Mohandas, and admiring towards Jawahar.

11. Similarly there has been no questioning of Obama's remark absolving Islam of the guilt of terror.

12. Unpardonable injustice done to Kalyan Singh, Uma Bharti, and possibly scores of "dedicated workers" who sacrificed a lot for BJP.

(II) Absence of Rule of Law during Congress Regimes

1. Dilly dallying in the hanging of Afzal Guru, the reasons being cited as "fear of probable law and order problems!".

2. Anti-Sikh riots of 1984 which were orchestrated by Congress leaders, executed by Muslims, and were "strategically" portrayed as Hindu-Sikh riots!

Always remember that for Hindus Congress is a non-hindu party, but whenever Congress has any fight with non-hindus, it portrays the conflict as hindu-non-hindu conflict.

(III) Inverted Freedom of Speech in this country

1. MF Hussein and Arundhati Roy being given protection while Sudarshan being harrassed. Protection to nude paintings of Hindu goddesses, but pressure applied on Google to remove a video clip showing a Mohandas look-alike doing pole dancing.

2. Congress leaders openly issuing violent threats while a senior citizen is being hounded for expressing his opinion about another mortal!

(IV) Hooliganism and Goonda Raj of Congress

Congress has always shown itself to be a collection of unruly and uncouth brigands masquerading as politicians headed by the traitorous Nehru-Gandhi family.

1. Dilly dallying in the hanging of Afzal Guru, the reasons being cited as "fear of probable law and order problems!".

2. Anti-Sikh riots of 1984 which were orchestrated by Congress leaders, executed by Muslims, and were "strategically" portrayed as Hindu-Sikh riots!

3. Support for Mulayam Singh's 1990 massacre of Kar Sevaks.

4. Corruption e.g. Bofors and so on.

5. Complete disregard for the Rule of Law during Emergency period.

(V) Unmanliness of BJP Leadership

1. Bangaru Laxman goofing during the Tehelka sting-operation.

2. BS Yeddyruyappa crying during the previous Karnataka crisis.

3. ABV/LKA/BJP regretting 1992 demolition.

These are surely truncated lists! Nevertheless they suffice now for the purpose of demonstrating the claims in the present context.

And so what's the moral of the story? It is high time that Hindus demanded a separate state for them. If there are Islamic countries, Christian countries and what not, then why not a Hindu country as well? And note that we take Hinduism = Hindu-Way-Of-Life = Sanatana Dharma.

Wednesday, October 6, 2010

A Quick take on Fundamental Concepts

KMS has asked a few questions of fundamental importance here. Here are my answers on the fly. I am printing the questions and answers both. The answers are in bold.

1. Are truth, Justice, equality relative? Or absolute?

1. The question of absoluteness or relativeness is within the scope of truth and not beyond it. And since any Justice worth its name must derive from Truth, it too is not necessarily bound by the qualifications like absolute or relative. Equality, except in a purely technical sense, could be considered as absolute or relative depending upon perspectives.

2. Is religion and Dharma same? Or different?

2. Different.

3. Is religion/Dharma one? Or many

3. Dharma is One. (Counter Question: Is Science one or many?)

4. Are all religions same? Are the eseence of their teaching same?

4. No. No.

5. What are Dharma Shasta’s? Could we consider Quran, Bible, Manusmrithi as Dharmashastras?

5. We could as in exercising our freedom, but we would be wrong in doing so.

6. Could/should we change Dharmashastras over time?

6. Could we? Dharmashastras? Possibly yes. Dharma? NO.
Should we? Dahrmashastras? No. Dharma? Not Possible! So the question is moot.

7. Could we change Vedas? In accordance with our times?

7. No. (Counter Question: Can we change the record of Michelson and Morley's Experiment?). But we may attain seemingly new understanding. (Like we may re-interpret the results of Michelson and Morley's Experiment).

8. If Varna is birth based, is it impossible to justify?

8. No. (Examples: Vishwamitra changed from Kshatriya to Brahmin. Jabala became a Rishi. Narada became Devarshi.) Even gender is not necessarily birth-based. (Example: Shikhandi was born a woman and became a man.)

But there may be some argument in seriously considering birth as a significant factor in determination of Varna.

9. Is it not possible to prove that Hinduism as a just system with Varnashrama as its integral part?

9. It may not be possible to prove it as a certain effect. But it may surely be possible to prove it as an intended effect, and may be experienced as such.

Thursday, September 30, 2010

Learning from Ayodhya

It was irritating to watch some of the Hindu leaders gloating over the judgment on Ayodhya by the Prayag High Court.

We must clearly understand that this is not victory as yet. Even after rightfully securing Ram-Janmbhoomi; there are other two equally important sites, viz., the Krishna-Janmabhoomi, and the JnanaVyapi temple of Bhagwan Shiva , which still remain to be secured.

Afterwards too, there are innumerable mosques in India which were built by destroying temples which existed at those places.

The simplest thing that a non-Muslim must understand from the Ayodhya dispute is that Never ever allow a mosque in your land.

And now that we unfortunately have many many mosques, we must aim for getting rid of all mosques.

There has to be No mosque in India campaign. Once we clearly realize that Islam is evil, and that mosques are spreading centers of this evil, we will quickly understand that having even a single mosque is tantamount to inviting a danger in future. Remember that prevention is better than cure, preventive medicine (removing all existing mosques) is better that unsure future cure (having to fight for decades and centuries for what is rightfully yours! with no guarantee of success!!).

Ayodhya Verdict : A Perspective

So the verdict is out on the Ayodhya dispute. Hindus are claiming victory, while the Muslims are planning to appeal the Supreme Court.

The case has many aspects, but we will concentrate on the three fundamental aspects here, viz.

1. Does the land belong to either of the Sunni Wakf Board, or the Nirmohi Akhada?

2. Was the structure built upon an earlier structure?

3. What was the nature of the earlier structure?


Answers to the above:


There is a term in legal parlance called "limitation". This says that if you make a large delay in filing your point of view, your point of view loses its right to be recognized.

In light of this, the answer to Question 1 is that the claims of Sunni Wakf Board and Nirmohi Akhada on the site are null and void. Period.


On the basis of evidence provided by the ASI (Archaeological Survey of India), it has been concluded that the structure which was demolished on December 6, 1992, was built on an earlier structure.

So the answer to Question 2 is, Yes.

3. On the basis of the same evidence, it was further concluded that the earlier structure was a massive Hindu structure, which was used as a place of Hindu religious activity as the birth place of Bhagwan Rama.

So the answer to Question 3 is, The structure was being used by Hindus as the birth place of Bhagwan Rama.


Now we come the three judges, viz., Mr. S. U. Khan, Mr. Sudheer Agarwal, and Mr. Dharam Veer Sharma.

1. None of these can deny the above answer to Question 1.

2. None can refute the evidence (they can ask for more research, at the most) by the ASI, hence they can not dissent on the answers to Questions 2 and 3 either.

So now the issue is, why is there a divergence of opinion amongst the judges? Before that, we should also take a look at the salient points of the judgments delivered by these three.

Mr. Khan and Mr. Agarwal opine that the place must be divided into three parts, one each going to Ram Lulla, the Nirmohi Akhada, and the Board. I am given to understand that their argument is that, notwithstanding the history of the matter, the place has been 'enjoyed' by these parties and they must get a share!

Mr. Sharma opines that in view of the above answers, the whole of disputed land must go to Ram Lulla.


It is clear that Mr. Khan and Mr. Agarwal are on a Mohandas-Jawaharian path. The judgment must be based on reason, but they seem to be carrying the doctrine of accommodation a bit too far.

Mr. Sharma on the other hand, sticks to the point and has given a categorical opinion.

I agree with Mr. Sharma on this point.

Sunday, September 19, 2010

Has the Meccan Imam apologized for the Somnath Plunder by Islam?

There was a proposal by a pastor (Rev Terry Jones) in the USA to burn the Koran as a mark of protest against the 9/11 attacks. (Unfortunately) He recapitulated and withdrew the proposal. But, lo and behold, the peace-loving muslims belonging to the religion of peace are protesting violently.

More unfortunately the AICC (All India Christian Council) too has criticised the Burn-the-Koran initiative. Do they criticise their clergymen when these clergymen mock at Sanatana Dharma (hinduism)? No.

Why hasn't the Pope apologized for the Portugese inquisition of the hindus? Why has the Meccan Imam not apologized for the plunder of Somnath temple committed by Ghaznavi?

These are, a small fraction from a large number of questions that must be answered by Secular (whether pseudo viz., Congress and the Left; or the self-proclaimed real - BJP and the Sangh Parivar) politicians.

But how can they? Aren't they busy mining in Obalipuram for iron ore and Common Wealth Games for loot?

Bloody *********.

Friday, August 27, 2010

Varnashrama : Initial View

In a recent blog entry India's casteism is allegedly exposed by a putative scholar. Now this is not the occasion to dissect the virtues and non-virtues of the said scholar, however great he may have been, nor should we mortgage our own freedom to investigate for ourselves in deference to supposedly higher intellects of amateur scholars, be it Mohandas, Jawahar, or Bhimrao. I am writing this post from the perspective of a person who believes that Sanatana Dharma has timeless values and that it is important to understand them and practice them. In that spirit, we make a few things very clear at the very outset.

1. The purpose here is to attempt to understand, rather evolve an understanding with respect to Sanatana Dharma in the context of the caste-system. When we say `evolve', we mean that by no means is this post meant to be a final word. If we are able to initiate a genuine and thoughtful discussion on this subject and can achieve some amount of basic clarity on this issue, a good beginning will have been made.

2. We do not think that caste-system is inherently bad, nor do we think that whatever has been or is being practiced in the name of caste-system is good, let alone have scriptural sanctions. However using the instances of such horrific practices to demean an idea itself would be intellectual dishonesty, as would be the evil act of justifying peculiar whims and fancies in the name of caste-system.

(As the discussion evolves, we may add more points here)

Even before we begin, we want to get a few technical terms right. We will use the word Varna, as opposed to Caste. Caste is often translated as Jati which has a different meaning from the word Varna. In the context of Sanatana Dharma, the terms jati and varna are NOT interchangeable. So we prefer to use the term varna. We would also recommend that similar choices be made in relation to other topics, for often the translated terms add to already existing misconceptions and misunderstandings.

So, we take it that in the context of Sanatana Dharma, the rights, freedoms, obligations and duties of an individual with respect to family, society, and so on, is outlined by the term Varnashrama Dharma. The term Dharma may have much wider scope, but its projections in the aforesaid context are Varnashrama Dharma.

Another point worth mentioning here is that even though the term Varna has been a controversial issue for long, Ashrama has never been! This is despite the fact that both are being mis-practised (in my opinion) for a long time! A so called brahmin who shooes away a sudra never chastises his father for not forsaking home to go to forest and pursue Vanaprastha! Strange has become this land of our nation! I wonder if we ever prusue anything other than meanminded self-interest and that too in a very slimy, dishonest and crooked manner.

There are many who will begin by quoting Manu Smriti or some similar text even before there is a canvas to paint the picture. I would like to state the canvas I have chosen for this article. Firstly I quote from various sources to outline the platform.

1. Shrutirvibhinnah .... (Mahabharata)

(Could someone provide the sanskrit original?)

The shrutis and the smrities are divided nor can the opinions of sages (munis) be taken as sacrosanct or authoritative (pramana); the substance and essence of Dharma (dharmasya tatvam) are very difficult to fathom and are almost inscrutable, therefore the path taken by the great men (mahajano) shows the way.

We have to understand this aspect of Sanatana Dharma very clearly before we jump to any conclusions. Sanatana Dharma has scriptures but is not bound by them. As some author has mentioned in the post on Truth Based Civilization, we have to understand the parallel between the term-pair 'science and scientists' and 'Sanatana Dharma and Mahajana'. What is science? Science is something that scientists do. Who are scientists? Those who do science. So there is an apparent circularity, and yet it makes perfect sense for us. Science is taught using text-books, but is not bound by any or collection of text-books. The whole structire stands upon commonly accepted standards of evidence, and verifiability. Similarly, Sanatana Dharma can be taught using books, but the structure does not depend upon books.

Currently both the Shruti and smriti are available as `books' but that may not transmit the essential meaning. Spiritual truths can be learnt by books only as much as swimming can be learnt by books! By a book we learn that the density of man is less than that of water (on an average) so swimming IS possible, thereafter one also has to get into water and practice. There are no arm-chair swimmers. But alas, there are arm-chair gurus! So the book, for example, might tell you that such and such things are possible, but one has to actualize the possible! So much so regarding the books! Thus even though we will be quoting from books, we must bear in mind that we use them more for expediting the actualization of the understanding, and not for jumping to conclusions.

However, books do serve a very important purpose. They give us enough material to intellectually chew on to evolve an understanding. One more remark will be in place here: Shruti is considered a higher pramana (authority) than smriti. So one has to keep this hierarchy very very clear: Understanding born out of one's own realization (has more authority that) the words of a living Mahajana (has more authority than) the recorded words of Mahajanas which are Shruti (has more authority than) Smriti. Since the cause of a profound understanding is difficult to fathom, the words are to be taken as revealations and words of Iswara and not a creation of a human-mind. We give another analogy here, Newton discovered the law of gravition, but what gave him the insight? Those who have belief in Iswara would consider it a grace/gift of Iswara. Another honest answer will be that 'we do not know' and that is fair too.

Why are all these things being said? Because Sanatana dharma is not like one-God-one-Book-His-messenger(s) type of system. It is at least as open as science is, and has unflinching regard for the pursuit of the True (without even assuming that some Truth exists!). For those who know the Truth, a belief in the Truth is not needed, and those who are ignorant of the Truth can only have a semblance of a belief! That is why the term used in Sanatana Dharma is Shraddha (means a willingness to explore the possibility) leading to Vishvas (Confidence after the successful realization/actualization). It is not "faith" based in the one-Book ideological sense.

2. Purush Sooktam speaks of Brahmana as the face (mukha) of Viraat Purusha and Sudra as the Feet (padah).

It is a mistake to identify face with the brain or mind! So first of all those who think Brahmanas are the brain or mind are all wrong, for the same sookta calls Moon (chandrama mansojaat) as the mind of Viraat. So let it be plain and simple that Brahmanas are just the face (as far as this sookta is concerned), and that's it, period! Further, it is hardly ever emphasized that what essentially this sookta hints at is the all-encompassing and all-embracing nature of Iswara. Even adharma is the back of Viraat Purusha! We are blessed that feminists have not jumped into the fray for discussion by saying that women have been forsaken! That's not the thing at all!

In my opinion, what this sookta tells us is the unity that the seemingly disperate members of a society have as their underlying background. If Brahmanas (whoever they may be) reflect the nature of the face of Brahman (the radience and so on), the Sudras make the motion possible! The viraat Purusha moves by the virtue of Sudras! What is the supposed quality of Sudra? Obedience. And just notice what we have in our country! Everyone being absolutely disobedient, claiming themselves to be the highest "caste"; thereby establishing that we are all more than 100% worse than Sudras. That is why, our country does not move at all, leave alone in the right direction! It is rotting owing to stagnation!

Ok. So what we make out is that the sookta speaks of the underlying unity and different functionalities of one whole; and does in no way imply overtly or covertly any meanings of superiority/inferiority.

3. Krishna in the Geeta says: Chaturvarnyam maya ...

I have made these four varnas depending upon gunas and karmas.

4. For every human there are four purusharthas (goals) viz., Kama, Artha, Dharma, Moksha.

Now is any of these four denied to any of the Varnas? The answer is No. It is claimed that In Rama-Rajya nobidy is unhappy, all have enough wealth, happiness and enjpyment. All follow their respective Dharma. This much for Kama, Artha, and Dharma. How about Moksha? Krishna, in his Geeta also says, everyone following the path of Bhakti, including women, vaishyas, and sudras too can attain liberation. One may argue that some inferiority of Women, Vaishyas, and Sudras is implicit in this verse. But immediately the question arises as to inferiority of what kind? An existential inferiority, or a disadvantage owing to occuoational encumbrances? If the inferiority is existential (i.e. they are infeior by their very existence!) then how can they attain liberation? This argument can go on and on, and it must definitely be settled. however, we will postpone that for a later discussion.

So we summarize these points as follows:

The Varnas are created by and are part of Iswara, and each has a right to fulfil the whole gamut ot its goals. Being part of one great whole, the varnas complement in terms of functionality and are not designed to be in any conflict with each other.

The apparent conflict in the descriptions and prescriptions by various texts are to be resolved in deeper understanding of the scriptures or the way shown by the mahajanas.

We pursue the caste-problem in the context of the above canvas now. In principle these scriptural injunctions of profoundly fundamental nature, are supposed to govern our life and behavior. But the story does not end there! Humans have weaknesses as well, and they want to rationalize and hide them too!

1. It is not uncommon to find the tendency to feel a sense of existential superiority in humans.

What is existential superiority? We have coined the term, and if you have a better term please do drop your suggestions. The term means, a superiority which is a given, which the person has merely beacuse he/she exists, and which can not be surmounted by those who are existentially inferior to him/her, bu any means at all.

So if I am existentially superior to you, then you may do anything, you may save a hundred thousand lives, you may win a Nobel prize, you may even get the Darshan (vision) of Krishna himself, and yet you remain inferior to me! And this tendency is not hard to come by! It is ubuquitous, much much more than you thin it is. I give a few typical examples:

a. Jews consider themselves to be the 'chosen people'. So nobody can convert into Judaism (the religion of the Jews). If you are not born a Jew, it's all over! You are a gentile or a pagan, and you can never change it. Please note that even under mis-interpreted Varna system, a Sudra can surely hope to be reborn as a Brahmana, if he/she so desires!

b. The belief in the members of Congress party that those in the Jawahar clan are inherently more suited to be the rulers of this country!

c. Black people thinking that they are inherently superior to others in athletics and sports. Note that this is never considered racism, but if Whites even suggest as a hypothesis that Blacks may genetically have inferior intelligence, it is termed rank racism!

d. Hitler considered Germans to be racially superior.

We are not saying that one should overlook trends in differences. But differences mean just differences, and not inherent or existential superiority or inferiority!

2. Often humans justify their weaknesses or wrongs using rationalizations. Typical examples are:

a. Using inconclusive or even cooked up evidence, for example, the Aryan Invasion Theory! The British used AIT to justify their conquest of India, firstly by saying that they were not the first (the Aryans were the first!). There are numerous stupid people in India even now who believe in the Aryan Invasion Theory.

b. Muslims all over the world rationalize the violence by Muslim-terrorists by claiming that there has been lot of injustice against Muslims. they overlook the fact that Muslim terrorism comes from Islam itself, for according to Islam, a non-muslim is unjust to Muslims and Islam by the very act of existing! So in their own words, non-Muslims must either convert to Islam or die!


Therefore, in my opinion, whatever understanding we evolve must be based on some sound principles, possibly like the ones oulined in this article, and not based on some ad-hocism!

By the way, intellectually Bhimrao Ambedkar was much much better than Mohandas was, even though the former belonged to putatively lower caste and the latter to a putatively higher one. Mr. Bhimrao had a much sounder understanding of Islam, and has written insightfully on the subject, completely unlike Mohandas who spent his life institutionalizing surrender-to-Muslims.

It is unfortunate that he (Mr. BRA) succumbed to human frailties, and let his bad personal experience get the better of him while forming his judgment about the caste-system.

Incidentally Swami Vivekananda has said many important things on this issue. Some of them are:

a. Caste should not go, but casteism should go.

b. Caste shuold not go, but privileges must go.

[Remark: We guess that he meant the sense of existential-superiority by the term privileges and casteism]

Further, we also need to figure out how Varna is to be assigned to an individual. Is it by birth, or acquired by performance, or some combination. Can Varna of a person change during his/her life time? There are many, what might be called, engineering issues to be answered before we have clearer understanding. But it will be better if we carefully avoid status-quoism as well as ad-hocism. Status-quoism leads to rotting, and ad-hocism to much worse!

Wednesday, July 28, 2010

The Author Behind Samalochaka Resigns

Syndicated blogging is a strange thing. Like politics, it makes for strange bed-fellows, and further it turns old friends into ideological foes.

Who would have dreamt that after being invited to write in a blog (along with the companion blog - samAlochaka) this author would some day be shown the door. Well, almost the same has happened.

I, the resigning author, have developed so serious differences with the chief editor of this blog that I find it no longer tenable to continue contributing to this blog. I, for one, have always been candid, and it is this candor which seems to ruffle many a feather. We (I and the Editor) reached a point where either I have to tone down what I want to say or the Editor will delete whatever I wrote.

So, we decided to have a frank discussion. And it turns out that parting our blogging ways is the only solution. So here I am, informing you all, that I, until now known to you as samAlochaka, resign from this blog. I requested the Editor to retain this name which is my intellectual child, and he has kindly agreed. He has further promised that he will appoint a new author to write on behalf of the same author-name, and try to emulate the spirit as much as possible, and as much as allowed in the blog.

So from tomorrow, when you read samAlochaka, understand that you are reading a different author, although in the same name. It has been nice having your audience, and I thank you all for the attention you have given me.

I wish all of you and this blog, all the very best. And I request you all to expect, nay demand, from the new author, the same outspokenness that you have got used to.

Monday, April 26, 2010

Who do I criticize and Why do I criticize.

A reader has blamed me for being selective in my criticisms. In particular, the reader, sdn, wrote:

To preserving hindu interest what we need is forward looking outlook what to be done next, by whom, how constructive suggestions proactive actions.

But typically what we are seeing is reassessment of past - where nothing is new but gaining more and more experience and expertise!

Blame Nehru, Gandhi, Indira, Vajpayee, LKA and now add Golwalkar (dont talk about Namboodari pad, Charu Mujumdar, Lohia ....)

Blame game - RSS blaming Congress, VoI blaming RSS, etc.

Skewed analysis criticising LKA talking of Hindu ethos (Note that Manmohan singh, Gadkari, Karat and Laloo dont talk about Hindu ethos and they are not criticised)

SDN's comment has two parts.

1. That
reassessment of past is incompatible with forward looking outlook.


2. I criticize many but not all. Specifically, I have not criticized Namboodripad, Charu Majumdar, Lohia, Manmohan and so on.

The first point is moot. If SDN is recommending that we must not look at and reassess the past, and that we must just concentrate on deciding future course of actions, one can at best sympathize with his acumen. Endless reassessment with no hint of a plan for proactive future action may merit disapproval, but censuring even a reasonable reassessment before action is downright foolhardiness.

The attempt to understand the past is indeed intended to develop a proper attitude for forward looking outlook. Those who do not learn from history are condemned to repeat the mistakes of the past. Any preoccupation with an urgency for the new with no understanding of the past will result in merely a cosmetic change of the policies of the past. This will clearly precipitate in the very mistakes that we should actively want to avoid.

This partially answers why I criticize.

The second point is rather good. Even though I often clarify my stand on targets of my frequent criticism, I have never outlined a principled stand regarding my choice.

The purpose of this author is to work towards bringing about a reestablishment through reawakening of Truth Based Civilization. We have been using the terms, Sanatana Dharma, or Hindu-WOL (Hindu Way of Life) synonymously.

Mohandasian Non-violence, Jawaharian Secular State, Socialistic Affirmative-action have all been termed poisonous. Having swept all political leaders belonging to this creed in one stroke, I do not think there is any need to mention them and their follies again and again. In my opinion, they are so worthless that it is not worth criticizing them except occasionally.

Sangh Parivar and its members are a different matter. They claim to be the protectors of the Hindu interests. So, to the undiscerning, they appear quite worthy. I have also mentioned that some of their actions which spring from their heart do merit appreciation. However, their biggest shortcoming is in the cerebral domain. Despite claiming to be avowed opponents of poisonous ideologies, their words often betray implicit acceptance of the very poisonous ideas.

What can one surmise to be the fate of Hindus, if their best protagonists are so far below the necessary standards? What should one do, if not to point out this lacunae again and again, till the points sink in and understanding emerges?

Who should one criticize, if not those who lay claim on the crown of protectors of the Hindus? Is it worth wasting the critical acumen on worthless creeps, which is what Congress and Communist parties of various denominations mostly comprise of?

The need of the hour is to work towards a political scenario wherein even the Communist parties fight for always the cause of Hindus, rather than continuing in the present situation wherein the Hindutva brigade remains busy proving itself to be secular! And under these circumstance, it is only those who claim to profess Hindutva, while betraying secularism, who need to be chastised. The non-Hindutva types do not even deserve mention, except sparingly.

Monday, April 19, 2010

Some important questions about Bharat Swabhiman Andolan (BSA), Baba Ramdev (BR), and RSS

A reader, Kiran, has posed two very important questions in my blog entry on Sangh Parivar (SP). And they are:

1. Does BSA or Baba Ramadev support Dar ul Uloom as a back up plan if his drive for Hindutva in BSA fails?

2. Has RSS too become secular(so called) in nature and in action? They started Andolans, but why it stopped/fazed?


Before we address these questions, we need to understand the mind-set of Hindus in India, and how that mind-set has come about. If we take a look at the state of our nation, it is not difficult to observe that:

1. Hindus think that being Secular is a great virtue, Hinduism is Secular and India is, rightly, a Secular country.

2. Non-Hindus (Muslims, Christians, Buddhists, Jains, Sikhs ...) think that India is a Hindu country, but it should be a Secular country, and it is the responsibility of Hindus in India to ensure that India becomes a truly Secular country.

Contemporary History:

Let me outline a few points from my understanding of the contemporary history.

1. Mohandas, who is touted as the role model for Indians, always claimed that he was a Sanatani Hindu, and therefore arrogated himself to be the sole representative of all the Hindus, was in his actions always an appeaser of non-Hindus, especially the Muslims.

Mr. Nathuram Godse has very clearly and skillfully analyzed and presented this aspect, in his defense statement.

2. Jawahar, who was Mohandas's illegitimate intellectual child was proactively anti-traditions, and since he identified Hinduism as representing Indian tradition, he was proactively and violently anti-hindu. That he was opposed to his daughter, Indira, marrying a Muslim, is another story, but it reveals how hypocritical this man was.

3. Mr. Hedgewar, the founder of the RSS, perceived the plight of Hindus, as he noticed that during most riots, which were quite frequent in his times (early twentieth centuries), Muslims were aggressors and Hindus were at the receiving end.

4. Mohandas proclaimed that a typical Muslim was a brave bully while a typical Hindu was a coward.

This might well have been true, and Mr. Hedgewar rightly wanted to change the attitude of the Hindus.

5. Further, as a consequence of Jawaharian direction in education, Communists of the likes of Romila Thapar, wrote, rather rewrote a doctored history of Indian subcontinent. The whole design was to achieve mass-indoctrination of the following two points :

a. Hinduism preaches tolerance, is secular, and is open from all sides.

b. Anything in Hinduism, that is other than the above, is superstition, casteism, and sexually perverted stories.

The Mistakes:

While Jawahar was being touted as a great intellectual (phew), and Mohandas was being hoisted as the role model (huh); most Hindus sucked up to it. And as a consequence of Jawaharian education with Mohandas as the role model, the above mentioned mass-indoctrination has been eminently successful.

Hedgewar entrusted the intellectual leadership with Madhavrao Sadashivrao Golwalkar, and in my opinion, he was less than equal to the job. Notwithstanding his other insights and his spiritual-intellectual competence, he expressed, at some places, his greatest admiration for the founder of Islam. And that has been one of his greatest undoings.

In my opinion, Hedgewar is the heart (emotion) of RSS, while Golwalkar is the head (reason) of RSS. It is not difficult to appreciate that while the heart of RSS may be passable, but its head is undeniably egregious.

The Present:

Owing to the success of the evil design of the education system, most Hindus have wrong ideas and even worse suicidal tendencies regarding India as the nation.

In that sense, it is not surprising that even some of the so called leaders, be it Atal Bihari Vajpeyee or Lal Krishna Advani, exhibit such rank stupidity when it comes to the survival or security of Hindus.

Needless to add that I have skipped the mention of Congress-Prime-Ministers as most of them including the current PM and super-PM, except Lal Bahadur Shastry, have been arch traitors, and have callously betrayed the Hindu electorate, who invested their confidence in them.

The members of the RSS, as well as Baba Ramdev are the products of the same educational-ethos. So it is not surprising that they have imbibed Mohandasian and Jawaharian instincts.

The Conclusion:

In light of the above, my answers to the questions you have posed are:

1. Baba Ramdev might shamelessly surrender to the Dar ul Uloom, even if he gets the support of very large number of hindus.

2. RSS is Secular in nature and in action, because they allow their Golwalkarian head to over-ride their (hopefully) Hedgewarian heart. Thus they start with a heart, and then stop without a head.

Saturday, April 17, 2010

Can we dream Sangh Parivar taking such initiatives?

When I lambaste RSS, BJP and the Sangh Parivar (SP), people often feel that I am over doing it. But when it comes to matters of head, these organizations have surely proven to be headless chickens.

Fortunately the world is not that bad. While the limp-d*ck old man was depicting nudity in the name of Hindu goddesses; Danish people were publishing, and republishing cartoons. Naturally it ruffled a lot of feathers. Now it turns out that it has ruffled a lot of forefathers as well.

Pamela Geller in her blog reported a nice item. I have copy pasted the item for the readers below, but don't miss the comments section at the original post.


Reverse lawfare -- a lawsuit is being prepared against the 94,000 Moe descendants for over a millennium of jihad wars, land expropriations, enslavements, and humiliations of the conquered non-Muslim populations on three continents.

Back in March I reported on a new front that opened in the Islamic litigation jihad on the vastly superior West. A Saudi Arabian law firm launched a mega Muslim lawfare attack against the Danish newspaper Jyllands Posten for the cartoons of Muhammad. The Saudi firm claims to represent 94,000 of Muhammad’s descendants.

In a major counter offensive, Hans Erling Jensen, Eticha (HEJ), has counter sued -- "now we know where to send our claims for all the threats, the bullying and violent acts that have come out of the Quran and hadith the last many centuries!” The Quran violates Danish law, specifically the well known 'hate speech' article 266b. Turning lawfare against jihad. I love it!

The lawsuit demands that the verses, suras, Islamic texts and teachings that prescribe, command, demand jihad be changed or expunged from Islam. The suit is to claim that Muhammad is responsible for a centuries-old persecution of women by asserting that they are worth less than men in intelligence, in matters of inheritance economy and parentage.

A future lawsuit will address that the Quran and Hadith imply that non-Muslims are the enemies of Allah and therefore were and are to be treated as outlaws. Due to the fact that Muhammed ibn ‘Abd Allāh al-Hashimi al-Qurashi claimed that not he but Allah was the author of this insult, and thus ascribed the saying to him, we find this not only blasphemous but also a thinly disguised attempt to decriminalize Muhammed ibn ‘Abd Allāh al-Hashimi al-Qurashi's own misdemeanors.

The lawsuit demands that designated changes be made in libraries, in all mosques and other public places in which these abominations are disseminated before December 31, 2010. Prior to this date the owners (we assume that Muhammad ibn ‘Abd Allāh al-Hashimi al-Qurashi’s descendants possess the rights to the koran, their ancestor's work!) must forbid publication in its present variation and likewise forbid its distribution by anybody remotely connected to Muhammad ibn ‘Abd Allāh al-Hashimi al-Qurashi’s descendants. It must neither be financed by funds nor organisations supporting these descendants in any other issue

Hans Erling Jensen, Founder of Eticha, sent me the following backgrounder and letter to the Saudi law firm outlining the lawsuit. This is the primer, the template on which to forge ahead. Clearly Armenia, Bosnia, Batak, Darfur, Nigeria, and all the countless genocides committed in the name of allah and jihad must be redressed as well. Legal minds, start your engines.

Robert and I of SIOA, Anders Gravers of SIOE, and Siad strongly support this action.

Eticha informs lawyer Faizal Yamani of upcoming lawsuit against Muhammad's descendants Supported by a number of Danish and foreign associations, the virtual network Eticha is planning to sue the Muslim prophet Muhammad’s descendants, the group preparing a libel case against a number of Danish newspapers. ______________________________________________________________________________________


It all began when Jyllands Posten in September 2005 published the now famous Muhammad cartoons. After half a year of boycotts, flag and embassy burnings, and various diplomatic crises between Denmark and the Muslim countries, we thought it was over. But no, nay, never! In the spring of 2008 the CIA revealed a plot to murder Kurt Westergaard - the cartoonist who had placed the bomb in Mo’s turban, and thus created the greatest symbol of "freedom of speech and expression" yet in this century.

The Danish newspapers reprinted the cartoons to show solidarity with Kurt Westergaard, which got the ball rolling. In august 2009, Faizal Yamana demanded an unconditional apology from the 15 newspapers to be published in various media across the world, in four different languages. By reprinting the drawings - and especially that of Kurt Westergaard – the newspapers had, according to Faizal Yamani, made themselves guilty of slander against the Muslim prophet Muhammad ibn 'Abd Allah al-Hashimi al-Qurashi.

Consequently, Hans Erling Jensen of, sent his now famous letter to the law firm, where he drew attention to Denmark's position in history and in the world. But little did it help.

Lawyer Yamani claims to represent 94,000 people, all descendants of Muhammad ibn 'Abd Allah al-Hashimi al-Qurashi, who demand an apology for the insult (they claim) their ancestor was subjected to by the Danish newspapers once again publishing the infamous cartoons.

Faizal Yamana intends to open a libel case in London against the Danish newspapers. Not that he expects to win it, he is too well educated to even dream of that. On the other hand, he has funding from a very wealthy foundation whose, objective is to protect Muhammad’s reputation at any cost. This libel case therefore constitutes nothing else than economic blackmail. One newspaper, Politiken, has already done the bean-counting, caved, and apologized.

At, we presented a new plan. Due to Yamanis' unethical initiative targeting the Danish newspapers, there was an obvious opportunity to countersue Muhammad's descendants, to one time for all obtain an apology from people as closely related as possible to the source of the outrageous accusations, slander and the consequences of these statements that generations of innocent and defenseless people have suffered for (the Koran). In contrast to Mr. Yamani, we have a solid case, and now we even know exactly who to target with the lawsuit, that we can achieve justice.

As of today’s date, we have sent the following letter to the law firm in Saudi Arabia:

Law Firm Of Ahmed Zaki Yamani Lawyers and Legal Consultants 35 Hassan Yamani Street, Al Hamra District P.O Box 1351 Jeddah 21431 Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Denmark, 15th of April 2010

Dear Mr. Faisal A Z. Yamani

I am writing to you after being notified that your legal firm represents 94.000 descendants of the prophet Muhammed ibn ‘Abd Allāh al-Hashimi al-Qurashi in a libel suit against several Danish newspapers. It is a relief to learn that the descendants of Muhammad have a representative, to whom we can raise our claim on behalf of people verbally vilified and physically attacked by the adherents of your religion.

This year alone, we have been contacted by a large number of individuals and organizations who are of the impression that you and your clients are not disposed to change your attitudes with regard to the scripture that Muslims allege to be Allah's words to Muhammed ibn ‘Abd Allāh al-Hashimi al-Qurashi.

You and your clients apparently continue to insist that Muhammed ibn ‘Abd Allāh al-Hashimi al-Qurashi may not be portrayed or caricatured. This implies that you and your clients give your unconditional support to the text of the Quran, as it exists today, as well as to the Hadith that, combined with the Quran (and the Sirat) form the basis of Islam and Sharia.

The descendants of the people whom your clients' forefather compared to apes, pigs and rats, and whose case we now represent, feel not only personally insulted, but also emotionally aggrieved by these denigrations, as their own ancestors have been ridiculed, persecuted and expelled from their lands, since the Quran and Hadith imply that non-Muslims are the enemies of Allah and therefore were and are to be treated as outlaws. Due to the fact that Muhammed ibn ‘Abd Allāh al-Hashimi al-Qurashi claimed, that not he, but Allah was the author of this insult and thus ascribed the saying to him, we find this not only blasphemous but also a thinly disguised attempt to decriminalize Muhammed ibn ‘Abd Allāh al-Hashimi al-Qurashi's own misdemeanors. This will possibly be addressed in a later court case.

Descendants' claim

With regard to the above, we request you to contact Muhammed ibn ‘Abd Allāh al-Hashimi al-Qurashi’s descendants, to demand an unconditional rejection of and an apology for a series of statements and verses in the Quran and Hadith which the said descendants must remove. This includes articles on the world wide web and all new editions of the Quran, Hadith and Sirat.
Our demand includes a long series of texts and/or assertions which your clients' self-appointed prophet said that he received as direct commands from Allah (via the archangel Gabriel) and which insult and intimidate non-muslims while inciting muslims either to violence or at best to the oppression of people who do not unconditionally submit to islam's dogma
Unacceptable passages

We have made a list of passages obviously inappropriate for a religion professing to preach peace and tolerance. There are passages asserting that certain Jews are descendants of apes and pigs [1], that there is only one god and that this god is Allah [2], that Muhammed ibn ‘Abd Allāh al-Hashimi al-Qurashi is his last prophet [3], that everyone who does not believe this and the day of judgment are doomed to spend eternity in hell and here on earth they shall be persecuted, tortured or murdered unless they convert to the Muslims' god Allah and approve the Muslims' prophet Muhammed as god’s messenger [4], that Allah should furnish detailed revelations of certain people's sex-life [5], that Muhammad ibn ‘Abd Allāh al-Hashimi al-Qurashi seen in today's light still is the best example people can have (in spite of his barbaric behavior) [6]. We also claim that the said Muhammad is responsible for a century-old persecution of women by asserting that they are worth less than men in intelligence, in matters of inheritance economy and parentage. For that we need a major alteration to be made public [7]

Changes necessary

These changes must also be made in libraries, in all mosques and other public places in which these abominations are disseminated before December 31 st 2010. Prior to this date the owners (we assume that Muhammad ibn ‘Abd Allāh al-Hashimi al-Qurashi’s descendants possess the rights to the koran, their ancestor's work!) must forbid publication in its present variation and likewise forbid its distribution by anybody remotely connected to Muhammad ibn ‘Abd Allāh al-Hashimi al-Qurashi’s descendants. It must neither be financed by funds nor organisations supporting these descendants in any other issue

We also demand that you before the termination of the year 2010 on behalf of Muhammad ibn ‘Abd Allāh al-Hashimi al-Qurashi’s descendants publish a clear and unconditional correction of and apology for the long series of gross insults, violations and persecutions of an immense number of people of other persuasions resulting from Muhammad ibn ‘Abd Allāh al-Hashimi al-Qurashi’s koran and its influence on his uncritical proselytes.

The corrections and apologies must be published globally with press-releases in English, Arabic, French, Spanish, Portuguese and Russian. We are acquainted with the fact that your legal firm has previously produced texts for this kind of apology and have therefore no hesitation in allotting this task to you and the descendants of Muhammad ibn ‘Abd Allāh al-Hashimi al-Qurashi, in conjunction with whom we are confident you will produce a suitable document.

Regarding the apology and the desired corrections in the Koran we imagine that the affair will have such high news value that it not will be necessary to make specific demands on which media are to be employed. We have confidence in the media's own ability to administrate and disseminate this fitting gesture from Muhammad ibn ‘Abd Allāh al-Hashimi al-Qurashi’s descendants. If you fulfill our demands before ultimo December 2010 the involved parties I have been in contact with will relinquish all further demands on Muhammed ibn ‘Abd Allāh al-Hashimi al-Qurashi’s descendants and proselytes. Here in Eticha we are at your disposal for any further information that may be necessary.


We are convinced that fulfillment of the conditions stated above will be seen as a commendable sign of respect and understanding among first of all women, Jews, Christians, Buddhists, Hindus, Asa-worshippers and atheists of all kinds in the entire world, and that you thereby will contribute to resolving the serious conflict which the koran's irreconcilable and denunciatory message has created through the centuries

I would appreciate an answer from you at your earliest convenience - though not later than 60 days from today's date - informing me as to whether your clients intend to fulfill the above mentioned demands or can suggest a compromise worth discussing.

If your clients - contrary to our expectations - decide not to collaborate, we reserve the right to initiate a global process of which the principal aim will be a court case against your clients for breach of compliance with international law on hate-crimes, incitement to persecution of dissidents and incitement to committing genocide.

Hans Erling Jensen, Fu. POBOX
XXXX Døllefjelle


Now, Sitaram Goyal did initiate such a thing in India, called the Calcutta Koran Petition. But these are not things that you must let go. The Parivar (SP) could have easily kept the fire burning all the while. That would have been a sample of serious and intelligent politics. Attacking the evil at the highest intellectual level. But again, what head can one expect in headless chickens? Instead, as I lamented, LKA is busy blabbering about Hindu-Ethos!